9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2025 (3) TMI 612 - HC - GSTValidity of assessment orders issued under Section 73(9) of the Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 against Max Ventures and Industries Limited (MVIL) - continuation of proceedings against a non-existent entity - HELD THAT - Undisputed facts are that before the three assessment orders were passed the company MVIL stood merged with the petitioner company and therefore the orders in question were passed against a non-existent company. The Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Maruti Suzuki India Limited 2019 (7) TMI 1449 - SUPREME COURT in a case pertaining to income tax came to the conclusion that the issuance of notice to a non-existent entity was fundamentally at odds with the legal principle that the amalgamating entity ceases to exist upon the approved scheme of amalgamation the judgment applies to the present case as well. Delhi High Court in the case of HCL Infosystems Ltd. 2024 (11) TMI 1331 - DELHI HIGH COURT in similar circumstances after taking note of provisions of Section 87 of the Act reiterated the same principles and came to the conclusion that the provision does not enable the respondents to continue proceedings against a non-existent entity. Conclusion - i) The assessment orders issued against a non-existent entity post-merger are invalid. ii) The provisions of the GST Act including Section 87 do not permit the continuation of proceedings against an entity that has legally ceased to exist due to merger. The orders dated 29.11.2023 27.04.2024 and 26.08.2024 passed under Section 73(9) of the Act are quashed and set aside - Petition allowed.
1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED
The core legal questions considered in this judgment are:
2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Issue 1: Validity of Assessment Orders Against a Non-Existent Entity - Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The legal framework centers around Section 73(9) of the GST Act, which pertains to the issuance of notices for tax demands. The precedent cases cited include Maruti Suzuki India Limited, where the Supreme Court held that proceedings against a non-existent entity post-amalgamation are invalid. The Delhi High Court's decision in HCL Infosystems Ltd. also supports this view, emphasizing that a company ceases to exist upon merger. - Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court interpreted that once MVIL merged with the petitioner company, it ceased to exist as a separate entity. Consequently, any orders or notices issued to MVIL post-merger are fundamentally flawed and invalid. - Key Evidence and Findings: The undisputed fact was that MVIL had merged with the petitioner company before the assessment orders were issued. The merger was recognized by the National Company Law Tribunal's order dated 21.07.2023. - Application of Law to Facts: The Court applied the principles laid down in the Maruti Suzuki and HCL Infosystems cases to the facts, concluding that the orders against MVIL were issued against a non-existent entity, rendering them void. - Treatment of Competing Arguments: The respondents argued that proceedings could continue against the transferor company despite the merger, referencing Section 87 of the GST Act. However, the Court found this argument unpersuasive, noting that the cited provisions do not permit actions against a non-existent entity. - Conclusions: The Court concluded that the assessment orders against MVIL were invalid and should be quashed. Issue 2: Continuation of Proceedings Post-Merger - Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: Section 87 of the GST Act was discussed in relation to the continuation of proceedings against the transferor company post-merger. However, the precedent set by the Supreme Court in Maruti Suzuki and reinforced by the Delhi High Court in HCL Infosystems Ltd. was that such proceedings cannot continue against a non-existent entity. - Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court interpreted Section 87 as not providing a basis for continuing proceedings against an entity that has legally ceased to exist due to merger. - Key Evidence and Findings: The Court noted that the merger was legally recognized, and MVIL no longer existed as an independent entity. - Application of Law to Facts: The Court applied the legal principles to the facts, determining that the continuation of proceedings against MVIL was not permissible under the GST Act. - Treatment of Competing Arguments: The respondents' reliance on Section 87 was addressed, with the Court finding that the provision does not support actions against non-existent entities. - Conclusions: The Court concluded that the proceedings against MVIL post-merger were impermissible and must be quashed. 3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS - The Court held that the assessment orders issued against a non-existent entity, post-merger, are invalid. The judgment cited the Supreme Court's decision in Maruti Suzuki, emphasizing that a company ceases to exist upon merger, and any proceedings against it are void. - The Court established the principle that the provisions of the GST Act, including Section 87, do not permit the continuation of proceedings against an entity that has legally ceased to exist due to merger. - The final determination was to quash the assessment orders dated 29.11.2023, 27.04.2024, and 26.08.2024, while leaving open the possibility for the respondents to pursue proceedings against the appropriate entity in accordance with the law.
|
