Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAR GST - 2025 (4) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2025 (4) TMI 419 - AAR - GST


ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal questions considered in this judgment are:

  • Whether the activity of leasing 19 onion mandis (Shops/Godowns) to a tender contractor for the purpose of collecting fees on a daily basis from merchants, farmers, and the public for the use of shops for selling onions is an activity covered under the functions entrusted to a Municipality under Article 243W of the Constitution.
  • If the activity is covered under Article 243W, whether it is not considered a service as per Notification No. 14/2017-CT(Rate) dated 28-06-2017, as amended, and thus not chargeable to GST.

ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents

The legal framework involves the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, specifically Section 7(2) and Notifications No. 14/2017-CT(Rate) and No. 16/2018-CT(Rate). These provisions and notifications exempt certain activities undertaken by local authorities from being treated as supply of goods or services, thus exempting them from GST.

Article 243W of the Constitution lists the functions entrusted to municipalities, which are relevant for determining the applicability of the exemption.

Court's Interpretation and Reasoning

The Tribunal considered whether the activity of collecting entry fees for onion mandis falls under the functions entrusted to a municipality. It examined the notifications and constitutional provisions to determine if the activity is exempt from GST as a function of a public authority.

Key Evidence and Findings

The Tribunal noted that the applicant, Tiruppur City Municipal Corporation, is a municipality under Article 243P of the Constitution and is engaged in activities such as renting immovable property and mandap keeper services. The activity in question involves granting the right to collect entry fees for onion markets to a contractor, with fees prescribed by the municipality and receipts issued in the municipality's name.

Application of Law to Facts

The Tribunal applied Section 7(2) of the CGST Act, which states that certain activities undertaken by local authorities are neither supply of goods nor services. It also considered Notification No. 14/2017-CT(Rate), which exempts services related to functions entrusted to municipalities under Article 243W.

Treatment of Competing Arguments

The Assistant Commissioner argued that the contractor, as a non-government body, is liable for GST. However, the Tribunal, referencing previous appellate authority rulings, concluded that the exemption applies to the contractor as long as the services are rendered as back-to-back services to the municipality.

Conclusions

The Tribunal concluded that the activity of leasing onion mandis for fee collection is a function entrusted to the municipality under Article 243W. Thus, it is exempt from GST under Notification No. 14/2017-CT(Rate) as amended.

SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

Core Principles Established

The Tribunal established that activities related to functions entrusted to municipalities under Article 243W are exempt from GST if they meet the criteria outlined in the relevant notifications.

Final Determinations on Each Issue

  • The activity of leasing onion mandis to a contractor for fee collection is covered under the functions entrusted to a municipality under Article 243W of the Constitution.
  • The activity is not considered a supply of goods or services under Notification No. 14/2017-CT(Rate) as amended, and is thus exempt from GST.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates