Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2025 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2025 (4) TMI 1155 - HC - GST


The Delhi High Court, through Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Rajneesh Kumar Gupta, disposed of a petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging three impugned Orders-in-Original dated 3rd December 2024, 24th January 2025, and 1st February 2025, as well as related Show Cause Notices (SCNs). The petitioner, Bajrang Iron Store, contended that certain respondents were impleaded only for clarification and were thus removed from the party array.The impugned orders imposed demands and penalties alleging fraudulent availing of ineligible Input Tax Credit (ITC) linked to a non-existent entity, M/s Himgiri Sales, under the GST regime. The petitioner claimed to have replied to the SCNs but denied receiving any personal hearing notice. The respondents countered that the petitioner's reply lacked merit and was cryptic.Relying on Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the Court held the impugned orders to be appealable, with a three-month limitation period for filing appeals. Although this period had expired for the first order dated 3rd December 2024, the Court allowed the petitioner to file appeals against all three connected orders within 30 days from the judgment date, stating: "If the appeal is filed within 30 days, the appeal qua order dated 3rd December, 2024 shall not be dismissed as being barred by limitation." The appeals are to be adjudicated on merits by the Appellate Authority in accordance with law.The petition was accordingly disposed of, along with all pending applications.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates