9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2025 (4) TMI 1271 - HC - Income TaxDenial of grant registration u/s 12AA - activities of the trust is in the nature of trade commerce or business and covered by proviso to Section 2 (15) - HELD THAT - Principal Commissioner or the Commissioner has to satisfy himself about the objects of the trust or institution and the genuineness of its activities as required under sub-clause (i) of clause (a) and compliance of the requirements under sub-clause (ii) of the said clause and has to pass an order in writing registering the trust or institution and a copy of the order so passed will be sent to the applicant. As in the matter of Ananda Social and Educational Trust 2020 (2) TMI 1293 - SUPREME COURT held that newly registered trust on basis of its objects without any activity having been undertaken is entitled for registration u/s 12AA. In the matter of Gujarat Cricket Association 2019 (11) TMI 35 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT the High Court of Gujarat has categorically held that the nature of the activities of the assesse i.e. Gujarat Cricket Sangh cannot take its colour from the nature of activities of the donor. Considering the categorical finding recorded by the ITAT that the object of the assessee is charitable in nature which could not be contradicted competently by learned counsel appearing for the appellant/Revenue during the course of arguments we are of the opinion that the ITAT is absolutely justified in holding that the assessee Society is entitled for registration u/s 12AA of the Act which is pure and simple finding of fact based on the evidence available on record and is neither perverse nor contrary to law. Decided against Revenue.
1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED
The core legal question considered by the Court was whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was correct in directing the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) (CIT(E)) to grant registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite the CIT(E)'s finding that the activities of the trust were in the nature of trade, commerce or business and thus excluded from charitable purposes under the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act. Essentially, the issues revolved around:
2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Issue 1: Interpretation of Section 12AA and the scope of Commissioner's satisfaction for registration The Court examined Section 12AA(1)(b)(i), which mandates that the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner must be satisfied about the objects of the trust or institution and the genuineness of its activities before granting registration. The Court noted that the provision requires a written order registering the trust if the Commissioner is so satisfied. In interpreting this provision, the Court relied heavily on the Supreme Court's decision in Ananda Social and Educational Trust, which clarified that the Commissioner's satisfaction under Section 12AA pertains to the genuineness of the objects and the activities, but importantly, the term "activities" includes proposed activities, not only those already undertaken. This means that a newly formed trust can be registered based on its declared objects and proposed activities without having commenced actual operations. The Court rejected the argument that registration must be refused if no activities have been carried out, holding that the Commissioner must consider the genuineness of the objects and the bona fide nature of proposed activities. The distinction was drawn between registration under Section 12AA and cancellation of registration under Section 12AA(3), where actual activities are scrutinized. Issue 2: Whether the trust's activities are charitable or commercial in nature The appellant contended that the trust's activities were in the nature of trade, commerce or business, and thus excluded from charitable purposes under the proviso to Section 2(15). The CIT(E) had rejected the registration application on this basis. The ITAT, however, found that the objects of the trust were charitable in nature, focusing on the promotion of cricket to bring forth new talents and provide opportunities for representation at state and national levels. The ITAT held that such activities fall within the ambit of charitable purposes. The Court also referred to the Gujarat High Court's decision in the Gujarat Cricket Association case, which held that earning surplus does not negate charitable status if the surplus is ploughed back into the organization's activities. The Court emphasized that the nature of the trust's activities must be considered independently and cannot be coloured by the commercial nature of related entities or donors. This principle was applied to reject the Revenue's argument that the trust's activities should be treated as commercial merely because of association with commercial entities. Issue 3: The effect of judicial precedents on the entitlement to registration and exemption The Court analyzed further Supreme Court authority in Commissioner of Income Tax Exemptions v. International Health Care Education and Research Institute, which underscored that registration under Section 12AA is a prerequisite for claiming exemption under Sections 10 and 11 but does not automatically entitle a trust to exemption. The assessing officer retains the power to scrutinize claims and deny exemption if activities are not genuinely charitable. This distinction reinforced the Court's view that registration is primarily concerned with the genuineness of objects and proposed activities, while exemption claims are subject to detailed factual scrutiny later. Application of law to facts and treatment of competing arguments The Court found that the ITAT's conclusion that the trust's objects were charitable was a factual finding supported by evidence and judicial precedents. The appellant did not successfully controvert this finding during arguments. The Court declined to interfere with the ITAT's order, holding it was neither perverse nor contrary to law. The appellant's reliance on the CIT(E)'s contrary finding was insufficient to overturn the Tribunal's considered conclusion. 3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS The Court upheld the ITAT's direction to grant registration under Section 12AA, affirming the following core principles:
Consequently, the Court answered the substantial question of law in favour of the assessee, dismissed the appeal, and directed that parties bear their own costs.
|
