Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1990 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1990 (10) TMI 212 - AT - Central Excise

Issues: Appeal against the findings of the order of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Madras regarding the classification of Pyrometric Cones as an appliance for MODVAT credit under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis:
1. The appeal challenged the decision of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) in classifying Pyrometric Cones as an appliance excluded from MODVAT credit under Rule 57A. The appeal was allowed based on a ground of limitation.

2. The appellants argued that the Pyrometric Cone, used to indicate the degree of heating of ceramic material in a furnace, should not be considered an appliance. They contended that the cone, made of materials similar to ceramic, serves a crucial role in the firing process by bending when the desired temperature is reached. They compared it to pyrometric tips accepted for MODVAT credit in iron and steel manufacturing, emphasizing the cone's role in indicating firing levels.

3. The Judicial Departmental Representative (JDR) supported the lower appellate authority's reasoning, which classified the Pyrometric Cone as an appliance.

4. The Tribunal analyzed the definition of "appliance" and "apparatus" in various dictionaries and legal references. It concluded that the Pyrometric Cone, as a device to ascertain firing levels in a furnace, qualifies as an apparatus or appliance. While acknowledging the distinction between pyrometric tips and cones, the Tribunal highlighted that cones play a specific role in ceramic firing processes. It noted that the cone's function is crucial for determining the adequacy of firing in ceramic material preparation.

5. The Tribunal interpreted Rule 57A's exclusion of certain items from MODVAT credit, emphasizing that excluded items are those directly involved in producing or processing goods or altering substances for final product manufacture. It determined that Pyrometric Cones do not change substances or directly participate in manufacturing processes but serve as essential aids in monitoring firing levels. Consequently, the Tribunal held that Pyrometric Cones are used in or in relation to the manufacture of final products, making them eligible for MODVAT credit.

6. In conclusion, the Tribunal found the lower authorities' findings on the classification of Pyrometric Cones as appliances for MODVAT credit were not sustainable. The appeal was allowed based on the determination that Pyrometric Cones are aids in the manufacturing process and should not be excluded from MODVAT credit eligibility.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates