Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 1992 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1992 (12) TMI 136 - AT - Customs

Issues:
- Imposition of penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 for abetment of smuggling activities.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The appellant contested the penalty imposed by the Collector of Customs and Central Excise for abetment of smuggling activities. The case involved Shri Shahabuddin Ghowri arriving from Singapore with undeclared goods, including wristwatches and currency. Additionally, incriminating documents were seized, implicating individuals in smuggling activities.

2. The evidence against the appellant included statements by Ghowri implicating the appellant in smuggling activities. The appellant's letter to Ghowri and the telegram received from Ghowri indicated pre-existing arrangements for smuggling. The appellant's denial of knowledge about certain individuals was contradicted by the evidence presented.

3. The adjudicating authority relied on various pieces of evidence, such as Ghowri's statements and recovered letters, to establish the appellant's involvement in abetting smuggling. The appellant's attempts to explain his actions were deemed insufficient, and the authority upheld the penalty based on the evidence provided.

4. The appellant's defense regarding the lack of clarity in the show cause notice and the penalty imposition was dismissed. Case law cited by the appellant was deemed irrelevant, as the circumstances of this case clearly demonstrated the appellant's complicity in smuggling activities.

5. The Tribunal found no grounds to overturn the penalty imposed on the appellant, as the evidence presented conclusively established the appellant's involvement in abetting smuggling. The appeal was rejected, affirming the penalty under Section 112 of the Customs Act, 1962.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates