9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Customs Valuation Rules - Inclusion of payments made to collaborators in transaction value. Detailed Analysis: The case involved an appeal by M/s. Oriental Carbon & Chemicals Limited against an order passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay. The dispute arose from a technical collaboration agreement with a Japanese company for setting up a plant in India. The issue was whether payments made to collaborators for basic engineering should be included in the transaction value under Rule 9 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988. The appellants argued that the payment for basic engineering was not directly linked to the imported goods, as the collaborators did not provide detailed drawings, and only a few items were imported from Japan. They also highlighted that no inspection charges were paid by the collaborators in Japan on their behalf. The learned Consultant for the appellants cited several decisions to support their argument that no loading of the invoices was necessary, emphasizing the lack of nexus between the disputed payment and the imported goods. On the other hand, the Respondent contended that the specialized equipment imported was crucial for maintaining product quality, as per declarations made by the appellants. The Tribunal carefully considered the facts and submissions from both sides. It noted discrepancies in the explanations provided by the appellants and the lack of clarity on certain crucial aspects, such as the role of collaborators in identifying suppliers and negotiating prices. The Tribunal found that the entire basic engineering fees were added to the price of imported goods, without a clear justification for excluding domestically procured machinery. In the interest of justice, the Tribunal set aside the previous order and remanded the matter to the jurisdictional Collector of Customs (Appeals) for a fresh consideration. The appellants were directed to provide additional information, and a new decision was to be made after a personal hearing, adhering to the principles of natural justice. In conclusion, the appeal was disposed of by remanding the case for further review, emphasizing the need for a detailed reevaluation of the inclusion of payments to collaborators in the transaction value of imported goods.
|
