Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1994 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1994 (6) TMI 94 - AT - Central Excise

Issues: Classification of Plastic Films printed with motifs under Chapter 4901.90 or sub-heading 3920.32.

Analysis:
The case involves a dispute over the classification of Plastic Films printed with motifs. The Respondents classified the goods under Chapter 4901.90, while the Revenue contended they should be classified under sub-heading 3920.32. The Assistant Collector initially ruled in favor of the Revenue, but the Collector (Appeals) set aside this decision and remanded the case for fresh examination. The Revenue appealed this decision.

The Revenue argued that the Collector (Appeals) erred in relying on a previous case that was not directly relevant to the current issue of classification. They contended that the subject goods should be classified under Heading 3920.32 based on Section Note 2 of Section VII of the Central Excise Tariff, which states that printed plastic films should be classified under Heading No. 4901 only if printing is not merely incidental to the primary use of the goods. The Revenue also cited a case to support their argument that the subject goods do not fall under the printing industry category. They highlighted the Respondents' contradictory stands in different appeals to avail duty concessions and MODVAT Credit.

In response, the Respondents' counsel cited relevant case law to support the impugned orders. The Tribunal noted that the Collector (Appeals) did not consider certain crucial aspects, including a previous case where the Respondents claimed classification under a different heading and were granted MODVAT Credit on printing ink. The Tribunal emphasized that the Assistant Collector should re-examine the case without being bound by the Collector (Appeals)'s opinions, considering all relevant legal principles and case law presented.

Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, modifying the impugned Order-in-Appeal to ensure the Assistant Collector re-evaluates the case independently, giving due regard to the cited case law and legal principles. The Assistant Collector was instructed to adjudicate the matter afresh in accordance with the law and without being influenced by the previous opinions expressed by the Collector (Appeals).

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates