9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved: Confiscation of gold biscuits and primary gold, confiscation of Indian currency, confiscation of vehicles, penalties imposed on various individuals, principles of natural justice, and validity of the proceedings against specific individuals.
Detailed Analysis: 1. Confiscation of Gold Biscuits and Primary Gold: The Additional Collector of Customs ordered the confiscation of 18 foreign-marked gold biscuits and 3 pieces of primary gold weighing 597.500 grams, valued at Rs. 8,76,590 under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal upheld this order, noting that the appellants did not challenge the panchnama and admitted the seizure of gold and Indian currency from the respective vehicles. 2. Confiscation of Indian Currency: The Indian currency amounting to Rs. 12.20 lakhs was confiscated under Section 121 of the Customs Act, as it was considered the sale proceeds of smuggled gold. The Tribunal confirmed this confiscation, finding that Ravi Garg failed to provide sufficient evidence to substantiate his claim that the money was from the sale of immovable property or business transactions. The Tribunal concluded that the cash was meant for purchasing smuggled gold. 3. Confiscation of Vehicles: The Additional Collector ordered the confiscation of a Maruti Car and a Bajaj Scooter under Section 115 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal set aside the order of confiscation and the imposition of a fine of Rs. 50,000 on the Maruti car, as the owner, Ashok Kumar Goyal, was not issued a show cause notice, which violated Section 124 of the Customs Act. However, the confiscation of the scooter and the imposition of a fine of Rs. 5,000 were confirmed. 4. Penalties Imposed on Various Individuals: - Ravi Garg: A penalty of Rs. 10 lakhs was imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act. The Tribunal reduced this penalty to Rs. 8 lakhs, considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case. - Surinder Kumar Anand: A penalty of Rs. 50,000 was imposed under Section 112 of the Customs Act, which was confirmed by the Tribunal. - Mohinder Singh: The penalty imposed on Mohinder Singh was set aside as the Tribunal found that he was not properly served with summons, and there was insufficient evidence to implicate him solely based on the statements of co-accused. - Ram Partap: The penalty of Rs. 50,000 imposed on Ram Partap was set aside, as the Tribunal found no evidence to show that he played a key role in gold smuggling. - Shyam Babu Verma: The penalty imposed on Shyam Babu Verma was set aside, as the Tribunal gave him the benefit of the doubt, finding no conclusive evidence linking him to the gold smuggling. 5. Principles of Natural Justice: The appellants argued that there was a violation of principles of natural justice as the officers and panchnama witnesses were not produced for cross-examination. The Tribunal found that the appellants had waived their right to cross-examination, as recorded by the Additional Collector, and thus, held that there was no violation of principles of natural justice. 6. Validity of Proceedings Against Specific Individuals: The Tribunal scrutinized the proceedings against Mohinder Singh and found that the department failed to arrest him or record his statement. The Tribunal concluded that the proceedings against him were insufficient to hold him guilty of gold smuggling. Similarly, the Tribunal found no substantial evidence against Ram Partap and Shyam Babu Verma, leading to the setting aside of penalties against them. Conclusion: The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of gold and Indian currency but reduced the penalty on Ravi Garg. Penalties against Mohinder Singh, Ram Partap, and Shyam Babu Verma were set aside, while the penalty on Surinder Kumar Anand was confirmed. The confiscation of the Maruti car was set aside due to procedural lapses, but the confiscation of the scooter was upheld.
|
