Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1997 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1997 (2) TMI 216 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Entitlement to Modvat credit for duty paid on Argon Gas.

Analysis:
The case involved a dispute regarding the entitlement to Modvat credit for duty paid on Argon Gas used in the manufacturing process. The respondent, engaged in manufacturing motor vehicles, was availing Modvat credit for steel shots and gases used in the process. The Assistant Collector initially disallowed the credit, but the Collector (Appeals) overturned this decision, stating that steel shots and gases are considered "inputs" under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The appeal was filed by the Collector of Central Excise challenging this decision.

The specific issue in question was the entitlement to Modvat credit for duty paid on Argon Gas. Previous tribunal decisions were cited to provide context. In the case of Kopran Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, it was held that Liquid Nitrogen used as consumable was considered an input under Rule 57A. Similarly, in Eastern Naphtha-Chem Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Hot Thermex in liquid form was deemed an input under the same rule.

Further, there were three tribunal decisions related to Argon Gas usage in different manufacturing processes. In these cases, it was established that Argon Gas was considered an input in the manufacturing of final products such as steel, tools, and machinery. The use of Argon Gas in various processes was deemed essential for the manufacturing of the final products, justifying the availability of Modvat credit.

The tribunal analyzed the use of Argon Gas by the respondent in testing in-process materials. It was determined that testing with Argon Gas was an essential process in the manufacturing activity, without which the final product could not be manufactured. Drawing parallels to previous cases, the tribunal concluded that Argon Gas was indeed used in relation to the manufacture of the final product, steel castings, falling under the purview of Rule 57A of the Rules.

The tribunal emphasized that the language of Rule 57A, stating "used in or in relation to the manufacture," had a broad scope and was intended to dispel any doubts. Citing the precedent set by a Larger Bench decision, it was established that items like Argon Gas, although not directly integrated into the manufacturing process, could still be considered inputs if they were essential for the production of the final product.

In conclusion, the tribunal found no grounds to interfere with the decision and dismissed the appeal, affirming the entitlement to Modvat credit for Argon Gas used in the manufacturing process of steel castings.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates