9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Determination of the relevant date for assessing the customs duty rate. 2. Effectiveness of the notification date for customs duty rate change. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Determination of the relevant date for assessing the customs duty rate: The appellant imported eight consignments of aluminium alloy coated carbon steel sheets in coils, which arrived in Bombay on the vessel S.S. Master George. The appellant filed a prior bill of entry for home consumption on 26-5-1984, which was assessed by Customs on 20-6-1984 at the then-prevailing duty rates of 40% Customs duty and 30% auxiliary duty. However, a notification dated 22-6-1984 increased these rates to 60% and 40%, respectively. The Customs authorities revised the assessment based on the new rates, arguing that the entry inward for the vessel was granted on 22-6-1984. The appellant contended that the vessel berthed and commenced discharging cargo on 20-6-1984, implying that the entry inward should be considered as granted on that date. The appellant argued that the Customs authorities should not penalize them by applying higher rates due to a delay in granting entry inward. However, the Customs authorities, citing Section 15(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, maintained that the relevant date for assessing duty is the date of entry inward, even if the bill of entry was presented earlier. The Supreme Court in Bharat Surfactants Pvt. Ltd. v. UOI supported this view, stating that the relevant date for duty assessment is the entry inward date. 2. Effectiveness of the notification date for customs duty rate change: The appellant argued that the notification dated 22-6-1984 should only become operative when it was made available for public circulation. They relied on various High Court decisions suggesting that a notification takes effect from the date it is put on sale to the public. However, the Customs authorities, supported by the Supreme Court decision in Pankaj Jain Agencies v. UOI, argued that rules and notifications take effect from the date of their publication in the official gazette, which in this case was 22-6-1984. Judgment: The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, agreeing with the Customs authorities on both issues. The Tribunal held that: - The relevant date for assessing the duty rate is the date of entry inward of the vessel, as per Section 15(1) of the Customs Act, 1962, and the Supreme Court decision in Bharat Surfactants Pvt. Ltd. v. UOI. - The notification dated 22-6-1984 became effective on the date of its publication in the official gazette, as per the Supreme Court decision in Pankaj Jain Agencies v. UOI. The Tribunal concluded that the Customs authorities were justified in applying the revised duty rates as per the notification dated 22-6-1984 and finalizing the bill of entry accordingly. The appeals were thus dismissed.
|
