1997 (7) TMI 233 - AT - Customs

Summary

Issues: Classification of imported goods under Customs Tariff, Benefit of Notification No. 169/90, Definition of capital goods under the Notification.

The judgment pertains to an appeal regarding the classification of imported goods and the applicability of Notification No. 169/90. The appellant imported goods described as "elements-metal fibre filter" and claimed classification under Heading 8421.99 of the Customs Tariff Act, seeking the benefit of the said notification. The Assistant Collector of Customs held that the imported goods did not qualify as capital goods under the notification and classified them under Heading 8421.99. This decision was upheld by the Collector (Appeals), leading to the filing of the present appeal.

During the proceedings, the Managing Director of the appellant argued that the imported goods were metal fibres, essential for the manufacturing process, and should be considered as capital goods under the notification. He contended that the filters were integral equipment for the manufacturing process of nickel in reactors. However, the Departmental Representative rebutted this argument, emphasizing that the import documents clearly indicated the goods as "element-metal fibre filter" falling under sub-heading 8421.99 of the Customs Tariff.

The notification in question, No. 169/90, exempted capital goods from excess customs duty, defining capital goods as plant, machinery, equipment, or accessories necessary for manufacturing goods. The definition excluded parts or components, focusing on complete equipment or accessories. The Court noted that the import documents specified the goods as "element-metal fibre filter," indicating their classification as parts under Heading 8421.99. Despite the appellant's assertions, the Court found no basis to consider the goods as capital goods eligible for the notification benefits.

The appellant also presented a pamphlet illustrating a filter system to support their argument. However, the Court determined that the imported goods were essential parts of a filtering system, not standalone equipment or machinery. As such, the goods did not qualify as capital goods under the notification. With no other contentions raised, the Court dismissed the appeal, finding no grounds for intervention in the lower authorities' decision.