9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962 in the context of refund claim for excess insurance premium paid on imported goods. Analysis: The case revolved around the controversy of whether the amount of insurance shown in the insurance document or the actual amount of insurance charged by the insurance company should be considered for determining the value of imported goods. The appellant argued that a lesser premium was charged by the insurance company compared to what was taken into account by the customs authorities. This discrepancy led to a refund claim for the duty levied on the differential amount of insurance premium included in excess in determining the assessable value. The lower authorities denied the refund claim citing Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962, which allows document amendments only under specific circumstances. The appellant contended that Section 149 should not apply as it was a mere error in premium calculation rectified by the insurance authorities post goods clearance. They argued that Section 27, an independent provision, should govern the refund claim assessment. In the judgment, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant's arguments, emphasizing that the purpose of Section 149 was different and not applicable in the present case. The Tribunal noted that the appellant was not seeking an amendment to the bill of entry but rather demonstrating that the insurance premium paid differed from what was considered by the customs authorities, supported by calculations from the insurance company. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the lower authorities' decision and directed the customs authorities to verify the actual insurance amount paid and allow any refund due, subject to the provisions of Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 as amended in 1991. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, providing relief to the appellant in their refund claim dispute.
|
