Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1997 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1997 (11) TMI 204 - AT - Central Excise

Issues: Classification of "Torsion Shaft" under Central Excise Tariff, 1985

Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification Dispute: The appellants contested the classification of the product "Torsion Shaft" for membrane coupling under sub-heading No. 8483.00 of the Central Excise Tariff, 1985, while they claimed it should be classified under sub-heading No. 8479.00 of the same Tariff.

2. Appellants' Argument: The appellants argued that the "Torsion Shaft" is an integral part of Rotary Kiln specifically designed for cement plants, aiming to avoid misalignment between the gear box and pinion. They emphasized that the shaft does not transmit or generate power by itself and is solely suitable for use with cement machinery, relying on a certificate from M/s. Shanti Consulting Engineers and a previous Tribunal decision in a similar case.

3. Revenue's Position: The Revenue classified the "Torsion Shaft" under sub-heading No. 8483.00, considering its function to transmit rotary motive power based on the diagram submitted by the appellants. They referred to definitions of "torsion" and "shaft" from technical dictionaries to support their classification.

4. Legal Interpretation: The Tribunal analyzed the definitions of "torsion" and "shaft" from technical dictionaries to determine the nature and function of the "Torsion Shaft." They referred to Section Note 2 of Section XVI of the Central Excise Tariff, 1985, which governs the classification of parts of machines, stating that parts falling under Chapter 84 or Chapter 85 are to be classified according to specific rules.

5. Decision: The Tribunal concluded that the "Torsion Shaft" is rightly classifiable under sub-heading No. 8483.00 of the Central Excise Tariff, 1985, based on the interpretation of Section Note 2(a) of Section XVI. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, ruling in favor of the Revenue's classification.

In summary, the judgment resolved the classification dispute by interpreting technical definitions and relevant tariff provisions to determine the appropriate classification of the "Torsion Shaft" under the Central Excise Tariff, 1985, ultimately upholding the Revenue's classification under sub-heading No. 8483.00.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates