9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Confiscation of gold biscuits and imposition of penalties under Customs Act, 1962. 2. Retraction of statement by the appellant and its evidentiary value. 3. Corroboration of statements and evidence against the appellant. 4. Comparison with statements of other accused and exoneration of some noticees. Analysis: 1. The case involved the confiscation of 10 gold biscuits of foreign origin seized by the police and handed over to Customs. The appellant, along with other individuals, was issued a show cause notice proposing confiscation and penalty under the Customs Act, 1962. The Deputy Commissioner confiscated the gold and imposed penalties on the appellant and another individual, while exonerating the remaining noticees. 2. The appellant's defense centered around the retraction of his statement, alleging coercion and duress. The appellant retracted his statement on the day after giving it, supported by a telegram from his brother and a sworn affidavit. The appellant argued that a retracted statement loses its evidentiary value and cannot be the sole basis for penalization. However, the tribunal found that the retraction did not diminish the statement's evidentiary value, especially as it was corroborated by other evidence. 3. The Department argued that the appellant's statement, recorded in his own hand, was supported by the statements of other individuals involved. The appellant's statement detailed previous transactions and was corroborated by the accounts of others. The tribunal found the evidence on record sufficient to establish the appellant's guilt, emphasizing that quasi-criminal proceedings do not require the same standard of proof as criminal cases. 4. The tribunal rejected the appellant's argument that since other noticees were exonerated, he should also be acquitted. The tribunal emphasized that each case is considered on its own merits, and the evidence against the appellant, including his detailed statement and corroboration from others, supported the decision to impose penalties and uphold the confiscation of the gold biscuits. In conclusion, the tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the penalties and confiscation based on the evidence and statements provided, despite the appellant's retraction and arguments regarding coercion.
|
