9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Application for dispensing with predeposit of penalty amounting to Rs. 5.00 lakh. Analysis: The case involved the recovery of 21 foreign marked gold biscuits from a business premises, leading to the seizure of the goods as the individuals involved could not provide legal acquisition documents. Statements from the individuals involved revealed conflicting accounts of how the gold biscuits were acquired. The appellant claimed the gold was sent for sale on a commission basis by another party, supported by documents like bills and challans. The appellant's counsel argued that the transactions were part of normal business dealings with proper documentation, including certificates and agreements with other entities dealing in gold. The appellant's counsel presented a detailed account of the transactions involving the gold biscuits, highlighting agreements, import details, and sales records with different entities. They emphasized the proper record-keeping by the appellant and the other party involved in the transactions. The counsel contended that the appellant had provided sufficient evidence to prove the legality of the gold acquisition and requested the waiver of the predeposit of penalty, citing the poor financial condition of the appellant. The respondent, however, opposed the request for waiving the predeposit, arguing that the documents submitted were manipulated and lacked essential details required for verification. The adjudicating authority found the documents to be insufficient and raised concerns about the authenticity and completeness of the provided certificates. The respondent insisted that the burden of proof under the Customs Act had not been met by the appellant, and thus, the penalty amount should be deposited in full. After considering the submissions from both parties, the Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs. 50,000 as a partial predeposit by a specified date, with the requirement to report compliance. The Tribunal ordered that upon compliance, the balance amount of the penalty would be stayed during the appeal process. Failure to comply would result in the dismissal of the appeal without further notice, indicating the seriousness of adherence to the Tribunal's directives.
|
