1998 (9) TMI 286 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
Challenge to orders disallowing Modvat credit on duty paid on input; Allegations in show cause notices regarding invoices and Modvat credit availed.

Analysis:
The appellant challenged separate orders dismissing appeals against disallowance of Modvat credit on duty paid on furnace oil used for manufacturing cement. Show cause notices raised five allegations: absence of "duplicate for transporter" on input documents, lack of date and time of removal, non-conformity with Rule 57GG, missing serial numbers of PLA debit entry, and absence of value in words on invoices. The first allegation regarding "duplicate for transporter" was discussed extensively. The requirement under Rule 52A was analyzed, emphasizing the need for the copy handed over to the transporter to claim Modvat credit. The court suggested verifying each invoice for indications of being issued to the transporter. The second charge of missing date and time on invoices was dismissed as the provided details related to goods removal. The third charge regarding non-conformity with Notification No. 33/94 lacked specifics to reject Modvat credit. The fourth charge of missing serial numbers of PLA debit entry was refuted as all invoices reportedly contained those details. The last charge of not showing value in words on invoices was deemed irrelevant as no rule mandated it. Ultimately, only the issue of invoices not being duplicate copies for the transporter survived. The court set aside the orders, remanding the cases for invoice verification and fresh adjudication, granting the appellant a personal hearing opportunity. Consequently, the appeals were allowed.