9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1973 (3) TMI 23 - HC - Income TaxGift Tax Act, 1958 -Whether it is obligatory to file a return of gift in the case of a deemed gift under section 4 - Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the default contemplated under section 17(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act was borne out ? - question referred to us has to be answered in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the department and against the assessee
Issues Involved:
1. Classification of land as agricultural for capital gains assessment. 2. Applicability of Section 52 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 3. Obligation to file gift-tax return for deemed gifts under Section 4 of the Gift-tax Act, 1958. 4. Levy of penalties under Sections 17(1)(a) and 17(1)(c) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958. 5. Reasonable cause for delay in filing the gift-tax return. Detailed Analysis: 1. Classification of Land as Agricultural for Capital Gains Assessment: The assessee claimed that the lands sold to New Delhi Theatres Private Ltd. were agricultural lands, thus exempt from capital gains tax. The Income-tax Officer rejected this claim, determining that the lands were not agricultural and assessed capital gains based on the market value of Rs. 5,14,600. 2. Applicability of Section 52 of the Income-tax Act, 1961: The Income-tax Officer invoked Section 52 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, estimating the market value of the property sold to the company at Rs. 5,14,600, thereby determining the capital gains accrued to the assessee. The Tribunal later canceled the assessment of capital gains, indicating a disagreement with the Income-tax Officer's application of Section 52. 3. Obligation to File Gift-tax Return for Deemed Gifts under Section 4 of the Gift-tax Act, 1958: The Gift-tax Officer held that the assessee made a gift to the company within the meaning of Section 4(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958, and assessed the value of the gift at Rs. 4,21,160. The assessee contended that it was not obligatory to file a gift-tax return for transactions deemed gifts under Section 4. The court rejected this contention, stating that a gift under Section 4 is considered a gift made by the assessee himself and thus, must be reported. 4. Levy of Penalties under Sections 17(1)(a) and 17(1)(c) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958: The Gift-tax Officer levied penalties under Sections 17(1)(a) and 17(1)(c) for failure to file the return on time and for concealment, respectively. The Tribunal confirmed the penalty under Section 17(1)(a) but canceled the penalty under Section 17(1)(c). The court upheld the penalty under Section 17(1)(a), noting that the assessee filed the return over 2.5 years late and that the penalty was calculated correctly as per the Act. 5. Reasonable Cause for Delay in Filing the Gift-tax Return: The assessee argued that there was reasonable cause for the delay, citing the revenue's own uncertainty about the nature of the transaction and the belief that the transfer did not constitute a gift. The Tribunal and the court rejected this explanation, finding no valid reason to accept it as a reasonable cause for the delay. Conclusion: The court answered the referred question in the affirmative, confirming that the default under Section 17(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act was borne out. The penalties levied were upheld, and the court found no reasonable cause for the delay in filing the gift-tax return. The judgment was in favor of the department and against the assessee, with no order as to costs.
|
