Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 1999 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1999 (5) TMI 97 - AT - Customs

Issues:
Appeal against Order-in-Original confiscating poppy seeds imported from Pakistan under Section 112A of the Customs Act, 1962.

Analysis:
The appellant argued that the imported goods were accompanied by certificates from various Pakistani authorities confirming the legal origin of the poppy seeds. The certificates from the Export Promotion Officer, Chamber of Commerce & Industry, and Quarantine Department at the Port of Karachi all declared the goods were legally grown in Pakistan. The advocate highlighted that the adjudicating authority acknowledged the Pakistani origin of the goods despite some packing materials with Turkish markings, emphasizing the importance of the certificates.

The respondent contended that the International Narcotic Control Bureau (INCB) communicated to the government that there was no licit cultivation of opium in Pakistan, leading to the presumption that any poppy seeds from Pakistan were not original. The respondent raised doubts about the veracity of the certificates provided by the importers, especially noting markings indicating Turkish origin on some packs.

Upon review, the Tribunal found that the basis for holding the poppy seeds as contraband was the INCB circular stating Pakistan as a non-producer of licit opium. However, the Tribunal emphasized that the import was governed by Notification No. 25 (RE/98) of the DGFT, which required licit cultivation of poppy seeds, certified by the concerned government. The Tribunal noted that the notification did not deem goods from Pakistan or Afghanistan as illicit, and the certificates provided by the appellants were from reputable Pakistani authorities, affirming the legal origin of the goods.

The Tribunal concluded that the evidence, including the certificates and the absence of proof of forgery, favored the importer. It criticized the lack of specific prohibition on opium cultivation in Pakistan in the import policy, suggesting that such restrictions should be explicitly stated. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original and allowed the appeal, granting consequential relief to the importer.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates