Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1999 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1999 (4) TMI 236 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Fraudulent duty drawback claim on semi-conductor devices, imposition of penalties on involved parties, cross-examination request denial, violation of principles of natural justice, reliance on report without providing a copy.

Analysis:
1. Fraudulent Duty Drawback Claim: The case involved M/s. Star Time and M/s. Elekta Electronics fraudulently claiming duty drawback by exporting rejected semi-conductor devices as power transistors at an inflated price. The Department contended that the exported goods were of inferior quality, and the excessive drawback claim was acknowledged by Sanjeev Arora, leading to penalties imposed on the parties involved.

2. Cross-Examination Request Denial: The appellant sought to cross-examine officers involved, citing coercion during confession as the reason. The Adjudicating Authority incorrectly stated that no reasons were provided for the request. The Tribunal found the reasons clear in the appellant's submissions, leading to a decision that the cross-examination should not have been disallowed.

3. Violation of Principles of Natural Justice: The reliance on a report from a foreign buyer without providing a copy to the appellant was deemed a violation of natural justice principles. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order on this ground, remanding the matter for a fresh decision after allowing cross-examination and providing necessary documents.

4. Decision and Remand: The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, emphasizing the importance of upholding natural justice principles and ensuring a fair opportunity for the appellants to present their case. The matter was sent back to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision with proper procedural safeguards in place, including the opportunity for cross-examination and access to relevant documents.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates