Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 1999 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1999 (5) TMI 182 - AT - Customs

Issues: Classification of imported goods under Customs Tariff and Import Policy

In this appeal, the issue at hand pertains to the classification of goods imported, specifically adhesive pads with loose sheets of papers cut to shape and size, having a self-adhesive coating in each sheet for self-sticking. The Additional Commissioner of Customs had classified the goods under Heading No. 48231100.90 of the ITC (HS) Classification, requiring a specific license for importation. On appeal, the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) classified the goods under Heading No. 48.20 of the Customs Tariff, allowing them under a special import license. The Tribunal was tasked with determining the correct classification under the Customs Tariff and examining the import license requirement.

Upon careful consideration, the Tribunal found that the goods in question were pads for noting messages with self-adhesive properties only on the top, not throughout the paper. While there were some differences in sub-headings between the Customs Tariff and Import Tariff, the main Headings were similar. Heading No. 48.20 under the Customs Tariff covered various stationery items, including letter pads and memorandum pads, which aligned with the Import Trade (Control) Classification under the same Heading. Similarly, Heading No. 48.23 was consistent in both Tariffs.

The Tribunal agreed with the reasoning of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) that the goods were correctly classifiable under Heading No. 48.20 and sub-heading No. 4820.90 for Customs duty purposes. Consequently, the goods were deemed classifiable under sub-heading No. 48209000.10 under the Import (Control) Classification, as they were considered consumer goods requiring a special import license. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the appellate authority and rejected the appeal filed by the Revenue, affirming that the goods were appropriately classified under the Customs Tariff and Import Policy.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates