1999 (10) TMI 262 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
1. Denial of Modvat credit and imposition of personal penalty by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise.
2. Validity of availing Modvat credit based on certified copies of gate passes.
3. Submission of a certificate by M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. after the passing of the impugned order.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Denial of Modvat credit and imposition of personal penalty
The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise denied Modvat credit of Rs. 3,06,235/- to the appellants and imposed a personal penalty of Rs. 30,000. The denial was based on the appellants availing the credit using xerox copies of triplicate gate passes, instead of the original copies. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision. The appellants argued that the original gate passes were lost in transit, and they had obtained certified copies from the consignors and Central Excise authorities. The Tribunal noted that while photocopies can be certified as true copies, allowing Modvat credit solely on photocopies is risky. However, considering the circumstances, the case was remanded for further investigation.

Issue 2: Validity of availing Modvat credit based on certified copies
The appellants contended that certified copies of gate passes were valid for claiming Modvat credit, citing previous Tribunal decisions and Board instructions supporting this practice. The Revenue argued that photocopies, even if attested, should not be accepted for Modvat credit. They pointed out discrepancies in the gate pass details and lack of authentication. The Tribunal acknowledged the risks of relying solely on photocopies but emphasized the need for the appellants to prove receipt of duty-paid goods and non-availment of credit by the first consignee.

Issue 3: Submission of a certificate by M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd.
A certificate from M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. was presented after the impugned order, confirming delivery of inputs to the appellants and non-availment of Modvat credit by their Rajasthan unit. While the certificate was not submitted to the lower authorities, the Tribunal considered it crucial for establishing the appellants' case. The Tribunal decided to remand the matter for a fresh decision, allowing the appellants an opportunity to prove the endorsement of gate passes in their favor without prior Modvat credit claims by the consignors.

In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for further investigation to determine the validity of the Modvat credit claim based on certified copies of gate passes and the receipt of duty-paid goods by the appellants. The decision emphasized the need for thorough verification and proof of compliance with Modvat credit requirements before allowing the credit.