2001 (1) TMI 321 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
Interpretation of extending deemed credit facility under Government order to units availing exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. after crossing the clearance value limit of Rs. 75 lakhs and paying full rate of duty.

Analysis:
The case involved a dispute regarding the entitlement of deemed credit facility under a Government order to a manufacturing unit availing exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. after surpassing the clearance value threshold of Rs. 75 lakhs and commencing payment of the normal duty rate. The appellants, manufacturers of rerollable products, had claimed deemed credit for inputs under relevant orders. The department contended that once the unit crossed the exemption limit and started paying full duty, they were not eligible for deemed credit. This led to a demand for duty repayment and a show cause notice was issued. The matter was adjudicated, with the original order rejecting the plea, subsequently overturned by the Collector (Appeals) in favor of the assessee. The Revenue then appealed to the Tribunal, which, following precedent, dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that the benefit of Modvat credit was specifically available to assessees availing of the Notification 1/93 exemption criteria. The Tribunal held that the category of manufacturers eligible for deemed credit remained unchanged even after crossing the Rs. 75 lakhs limit, as they continued to operate under the same criteria of the notification.

The Revenue, dissatisfied with the Tribunal's decision, filed a reference application, which was rejected by the Tribunal, maintaining the correctness of its earlier view based on the Venkateswara Steel Industries case. Subsequently, the High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the question to answer whether the CEGAT was correct in extending deemed credit facility to units availing exemption under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. post-exceeding the Rs. 75 lakhs clearance value limit and paying full duty. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Tribunal drew up a statement of the case for submission to the High Court for resolution. The case highlighted the intricate interplay between statutory notifications, clearance thresholds, and entitlement to deemed credit, underscoring the importance of adhering to the specific criteria outlined in the relevant regulations for availing such benefits.

This detailed analysis of the judgment showcases the nuanced legal interpretation and application of statutory provisions governing the availability of deemed credit facility to manufacturing units under specific exemption criteria, particularly in instances where clearance thresholds and duty payment obligations undergo changes during the course of operations.