Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2001 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2001 (1) TMI 410 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
1. Benefit of Modvat credit for dutiable goods
2. Validity of filing Misc. Application after Final Order

Analysis:
1. Benefit of Modvat credit for dutiable goods:
The case involved a Misc. Application filed by M/s. Simba FRP Pvt. Ltd. seeking the benefit of Modvat credit for inputs and capital goods used in manufacturing goods classified as dutiable. The Appellant argued that as the goods were now classified as dutiable, they should be eligible for Modvat credit. The Advocate cited precedents such as Veena Organics (P) Ltd. v. CCE and Electrometal Ltd. v. CCE to support the claim. However, the Respondent contended that the Tribunal cannot pass further orders after a Final Order, relying on the decision in Mantona Valves & Compressors v. Commissioner of Customs. The Appellant failed to raise the Modvat credit issue during the appeal stage, leading to the rejection of the application.

2. Validity of filing Misc. Application after Final Order:
The Respondent argued that a Misc. Application is not maintainable after a Final Order, as the Tribunal becomes functus officio. The Appellant's attempt to rely on a Larger Bench decision was countered by the argument that the decision did not apply to the present case. The Tribunal noted that the Appellant did not raise the Modvat credit issue during the appeal proceedings, and as the matter had been closed with a Final Order, the application for Modvat credit could not be entertained. The Tribunal rejected the Misc. Application, emphasizing that the Appellant's failure to raise the issue during the appeal stage precluded them from claiming the benefit of Modvat credit after the Final Order was passed.

In conclusion, the Tribunal rejected the Misc. Application, as the Appellant did not raise the issue of Modvat credit during the appeal proceedings, and the Tribunal could not entertain the claim after passing a Final Order. The decision highlighted the importance of raising all relevant issues during the appropriate stages of the legal process to avail of benefits such as Modvat credit.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates