Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1999 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1999 (8) TMI 665 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
- Requirement of pre-deposit for hearing appeals
- Applicability of AR4 procedure for small scale industries
- Imposition of duty and penalties for non-compliance
- Interpretation of relevant judgments and circulars
- Verification of actual export of goods
- Necessity of executing bonds for duty liability
- Consideration of procedural conditions for exemption

Analysis:

The judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Chennai involved the requirement of pre-deposit for hearing appeals related to duty amounts and penalties. The appellants sought waiver and stay based on previous judgments in their favor. The main issue was the applicability of the AR4 procedure for small scale industries in clearing goods for export without payment of duty. The appellants argued that despite providing evidence of export, duty was confirmed and penalties imposed due to non-compliance with procedural requirements.

The consultant for the appellants cited various judgments and a circular relaxing the AR4 form procedure for small scale industries. They emphasized that duty should not be levied on exported goods with sufficient proof. The Tribunal considered these arguments and granted waiver of pre-deposit based on the strong prima facie case made by the appellants.

However, the respondent pointed out that the orders lacked clear findings on whether the goods were actually exported. They argued that non-execution of bonds during the transit period exposed the duty liability. The Tribunal agreed that verification of actual export was necessary before making a decision on merits. The matter was remanded to the original authority for a detailed examination, ensuring the appellants' right to be heard and produce evidence regarding the claimed export of goods.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, directing the Commissioner to consider all relevant citations and the circular relaxing procedures for small scale industries. The judgment highlighted the importance of verifying actual export and complying with procedural conditions for exemption from duty and penalties.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates