Article Section | |||||||||||
Home Articles Goods and Services Tax - GST Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN Experts This |
|||||||||||
SUPPLY OF SPACE FOR ADVERTISEMENT IN PRINT MEDIA – APPLICABILITY OF GST |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
SUPPLY OF SPACE FOR ADVERTISEMENT IN PRINT MEDIA – APPLICABILITY OF GST |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
IN RE: M/S. TIME EDUCATION KOLKATA PRIVATE LIMITED - 2022 (7) TMI 750 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, TELANGANA, the appellant is in the business of purchase and supply of advertisement space to the prospective customers. They are also supplying artwork to adorn the space. The appellant sought Advance Ruling before the Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana on the following questions-
The appellant does not charge for the artwork in certain cases. The appellant was of the view that the activity of artwork by the applicant forms part of composite supply of advertisement space and artwork and therefore the total supply should attract tax @ 5% under HSN 998363. The Authority for Advance Ruling examined the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28.06.2017. The Authority for Advance Ruling observed that the said Notification makes a clear distinction between sale of mere advertisement space and ‘Other advertisement space’, which is having a separate SAC code i.e., 998366. The appellant is supplying two different services and each is attracting different tariffs under this notification. Therefore this will not amount to composite supply. The Authority for Advance Ruling ruled that-
Being aggrieved by the ruling given by the Authority for Advance Ruling the appellant filed the present appeal before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling. The appellant submitted the following before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling to prove his stand that the services rendered by him is a composite supply and is liable under the HSN Code 998363 which attracts 5% GST-
The appellant relied on the ruling given by the Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand IN RE : HARMILAP MEDIA (P) LTD. - 2020 (3) TMI 293 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING - UTTARAKHAND. In this case the Authority for Advance Ruling ruled that ‘selling of space in print media’ constitutes the predominant element of a composite supply and designing/ composition of the advertisement is ancillary to the said composite supply. Accordingly, the composite supply comprises of selling of space in print media and designing/composing of the advertisement, will attract GST @ 5% inasmuch as ‘selling of space in print media’ is a principal supply which attract GST @ 5%”. In view of the above the appellant prayed to set aside or modify the impugned ruling given by the Authority for Advance Ruling. Personal hearing was given to the appellant. The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling considered the arguments put forth by the appellant and also the order passed by the Authority for Advance Ruling. The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling analyzed the HSN Codes-
The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling observed that HSN 998366 relates to space other than print media, i.e., advertisements on Billboards, Buildings, Vehicles, Electronic media, and advertising in video & motion pictures. The activity of the appellants in the subject case is sale of advertising space in print media and is not on Bill boards, Buildings, Vehicles etc. Therefore, the findings of AAR and its ruling with regard to classification of service is not in consonance with the explanatory notes. The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling further observed that apart from selling the space for advertisement in print media, the appellant is also providing the services of designing or art work. As seen from the explanatory notes under 998663, it is ‘sale of advertising space in print media’ which clearly notify that the vacant space or blank space is for the purpose of advertising only. as the appellant is selling space and also providing design or art work, the activity cannot be called as mere selling of advertising space but ‘Advertising Service’ falling under HSN 998361. Therefore, the concept of composite service for deciding the rate of tax cannot be applied to Advertising Service, which involves host of activities which have their own relevance and importance. In such specialized services, the nature of service can be decided on the basis of contract or agreement and each contract may have different activities involved. The purpose of advertisement will also have impact on what kind of art work is required. The appellant has not submitted any contract or agreement which tells about the scope of activity involved in printing the advertisement within the given space in print media. Therefore the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling held that any additional work or service provided to enhance the appearance of advertisement cannot be called as mere sale of advertising space in print media. The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling set aside the ruling given by the Authority for Advance Ruling with regard to classification of service under SAC 998366. The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling gave the following ruling in the present appeal-
By: Mr. M. GOVINDARAJAN - August 26, 2022
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||