Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Article Section

Home Articles Service Tax Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal Experts This

HANDLING CESTAT APPEALS

Submit New Article
HANDLING CESTAT APPEALS
Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal By: Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal
March 28, 2017
All Articles by: Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal       View Profile
  • Contents

Validity of registration fee

Vide Circular dated 20.07.2016, it has been advised that since the Demand Draft (DD) Pay Order (PO) is valid only for three months and that scrutiny, rectification of defects, forwarding the demand draft or pay order for clearance consumes considerable time, it should be ensured that DD/PO submitted towards appeal application fee must be valid for atleast 60 days on the date of submission of appeal.

Submission of brief note

Vide Cestat Circular dated 1.8.2016, it has been advised that in order to expedite the disposal of cases, the parties to appeals can submit a brief note in 3-4 pages at the time of hearing. It appears that this 3-4 pages synopsis may help the Bench to have a quick glance and reference to the factual matrix and issues involved in an appeal.

Vide Cestat Notification No. 1/2017 dated 25.01.2017, it has been directed that all stakeholders should follow the following in respect of appeals filed before the Tribunal:

" 1. Certified copy means the original copy of the order received by the party, or a  (including a Photostat copy) thereof duly authenticated by the concerned department, or a copy (including a Photostat copy) duly authenticated by the Advocate/Charted Accountant/Consultant duly authorized by the appellant. [Rule 2(f)]

2. Every memorandum of appeal, cross-objections, reference applications, stay applications or any other miscellaneous applications shall also be typed neatly in double spacing on the A4 size paper and the same shall be duly paged, indexed and tagged firmly with each paper book put in a separate folder. [Rule 8(2)]."

Seeking adjournment before Cestat

Vide Cestat Notice dated 8.11.2016, it has been advised to advocates / consultants and authorised representatives of the parties to  intimate regarding seeking of adjournment to the opposite parties (counsel) at least before 48 hours of hearing of the appeal /cases. Parties are requested to exchange written note /case law etc. at list 48 hrs in advance.

This has been done to discourage seeking adjournment in the open court at the time of hearing which cause difficulties to other parties who have made the preparation and travelled to argue the case.

Numbering system for registration of appeals and orders

Vide Cestat Circular dated 30.12.2016, five digit numbers have been assigned for registration of appeals at different benches of Cestat. The relevant extracts of the Circular are as under:

"All concerned are aware that separate blocks of digits system has been implemented from 01/01/2013 for registration of appeals and identification of orders for each Bench. All appeals may continue to be allotted with unique number as per the series shown below!3 The same pattern may be followed in numbering of orders too. The different Benches will have to follow the five digit numbers in the block as indicated below against them.

Bench

Series

Ahmedabad

10000-20000

Bangalore

20001-30000

Hyderabad

30001-40000

Chennai

40001-50000

Delhi

50001-60000

Chandigarh

60001-70000

Allahabad

70001-75000

Kolkata

75001-85000

Mumbai

85001-99000

Alternative Appeals

Vide Circular No. 1 (05) /Circular / Cestat / 2017 dated 27.02.2017, it has been directed  to concerned parties while filing appeal/ applications before the Tribunal, they have to give an undertaking in the following format along with the appeals / applications to be filed before Cestat:

"Matter not previously filed or pending before any other legal forum including Hon'ble High Courts/Supreme Court.

The appellant/ applicant further declares that he has not previously filed any appeal, writ petition or suit regarding the impugned order, before any court or any other authority or any other Bench of the Tribunal."

This has been done to curb and check the practice of seeking alternate or simultaneous remedies before other forums such as High Courts / Supreme Court which may be suppressed while filing appeal or application etc before the Tribunal.

 

By: Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal - March 28, 2017

 

Discussions to this article

 

Nice article sir. It enriched my knowledge. Thanks.

Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal By: Ganeshan Kalyani
Dated: March 28, 2017

Tenure of current President has an imprint of his different style of working. Adjournments are easy to seek during mention but so are the dismissals for non-appearance without advance notice - highest so far in my memory. The declarations about matter pending at alternate forum is a positive step towards strategic non-resolution of the litigation. No bar in filing appeal / writ - but declare it transparently. Synopsis is a good step, especially as we lawyers are adept in confusing issues by a longish pleading. There is a commercial compulsion also - some clients feel shortchanged if a short crisp appeal is prepared. They then count the number of words vis-a-vis the money charged. Puzzled whether A-4 has become permissible in addition to Legal size or has replaced it ? Would have been better if it was elaborated - such as font size, margin and so on. Thank you for continuous updation of our knowledge Doctor Sahib. We are your Eklavya.

Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal By: Rakesh Chitkara
Dated: March 29, 2017

I appreciate Sh.Rakesh Chitkara's style of showing honour to legal expert Dr.Sanjiv Agarwal. I also read his articles word for word.

Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal By: KASTURI SETHI
Dated: April 3, 2017

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates