Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2011 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (1) TMI 1220 - HC - Companies Law


Issues:
Challenge to notice under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act; Applicability of section 22 of the SICA; Abatement of proceedings before BIFR; Interpretation of provisions under SARFAESI Act and SICA.

Analysis:

1. Challenge to Notice under SARFAESI Act:
The petitioner, a company facing financial difficulties, challenged a notice issued under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act by the first respondent claiming a substantial sum due. The petitioner argued that they were protected under section 22 of the SICA, making the SARFAESI Act proceedings jurisdictionally flawed as the petitioner had not taken measures to recover the secured debt as required under the SICA.

2. Applicability of Section 22 of the SICA:
The petitioner contended that section 22 of the SICA provided protection, preventing further proceedings under the SARFAESI Act. The first respondent argued that the second proviso to section 15(1) of the SICA mandated that the petitioner's proceedings before the BIFR would abate unless secured creditors representing a majority had taken measures to recover the debt under the SARFAESI Act.

3. Abatement of Proceedings before BIFR:
The court analyzed the proviso under SICA, which stated that pending references before the BIFR would abate if secured creditors representing a significant portion had initiated recovery measures under the SARFAESI Act. The court found that mere issuance of a notice under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act did not constitute taking measures to recover the debt, as required by the proviso.

4. Interpretation of Provisions under SARFAESI Act and SICA:
The court examined sections 13(2) and 13(9) of the SARFAESI Act to determine that the issuance of a notice did not automatically trigger the exercise of rights under section 13(4). The court emphasized that cooperation among secured creditors was necessary before proceeding to recover the debt under section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. In this case, as other secured creditors had not taken similar actions, the court held that the proceedings had not abated and section 22 of the SICA applied, barring further action under the SARFAESI Act.

5. Conclusion:
The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the notice under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, clarifying that the notice could not be quashed as it did not constitute a measure to exercise the power under section 13(4) of the SARFAESI Act. The court directed the petitioner to either comply with the demand or respond appropriately, leaving further action to the first respondent in accordance with the SARFAESI Act and the SICA.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates