Section 53(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) ...

Unsecured financial creditors take precedence over operational creditors in liquidation asset distribution.

Case Laws IBC

September 23, 2024

Section 53(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) provides for the order of priority in the distribution of liquidation assets. Financial debts owed to unsecured creditors rank higher at clause (d) than operational debts which fall under clause (f). The appellant, an operational creditor, cannot claim priority over the respondent, an unsecured financial creditor, even if the respondent is a related party. The definition of 'financial debt' u/s 5(8) does not exclude debts from related parties. While related parties may face restrictions u/ss 21 and 29A, their financial debts retain priority over operational debts in liquidation distribution as per Section 53(1). The Supreme Court's judgment upheld the intelligible differentia between financial and operational debts, and the BLRC Report highlighted the importance of unsecured financial creditors' dues. The NCLAT correctly dismissed the appellant's application seeking priority over the unsecured financial creditor.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Section 53(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) ...

Unsecured financial creditors take precedence over operational creditors in liquidation asset distribution.

Case Laws IBC

September 23, 2024

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's order and dismissed the appeal filed by the Resolution Professional (RP) against the Operational Creditor. The...

Step to be taken by the ‘Liquidator’ during the ‘Liquidation’. - the scheme must ensure maximisation of the assets of the ‘Corporate Debtor’ and balance the stakeholders...

Challenge to an approved Resolution Plan where no consideration was given to payment to an Operational Creditor. The key points are: Section 30(2)(b) mandates that...

The tribunal granted relief regarding the capital structure, extinguishing liabilities towards financial and operational creditors, legal proceedings, and taxation...

Corporate insolvency process - Power of Board to decide amount is to be paid to the ‘Financial Creditor’ or ‘Operational Creditor’ including the liquidation value - SC...

CIRP process - We are not convinced with the argument that amended Sub-Section (4) of Section 30 requires only Secured Financial Creditors to contribute towards interim...

Approval of Resolution Plan - The Tribunal found the resolution plan’s treatment of operational creditors contrary to Section 30(2)(b) of the IBC, as operational...

Classification of applicant - unsecured creditors or not - the Applicant cannot take to plea that he is not aware of the fact that he is classified as unsecured creditor....

Initiation of CIRP - Flat Buyer is a Financial Creditor or not - Whether ‘HBPL’ falls within the ambit of the definition of ‘Corporate Debtor’, as defined under Section...

Insolvency resolution process - Secured and unsecured creditors; the equality principle - the equality principle cannot be stretched to treating unequals equally, as...

CIRP - Classification of Appellant as Operational Creditor and Exclusion from COC Meetings - Financial Creditor or Operational Creditor - The Supreme Court held that the...

Liability to contribute towards Liquidation Process Costs - scope of Financial Institution - The Tribunal found that the appellant, having invested a significant sum by...

The NCLAT held that the statutory protection granted to operational creditors u/s 30(2)(b) of the IBC is that they shall not receive less than the specified amounts. The...

CIRP - Unsecured Financial Creditor or not - Non-registration of charge before the Registrar of Companies - the mortgaged property, will form part of the Liquidation...

CIRP proceedings - on the basis of parity being deployed by the RP in admitting claims of both category of financial creditors, there remains no reason to be aggrieved....

Quick Updates: