9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Confirmation of addition of unexplained cash in wealth-tax assessment.
Summary: The appeal arose from the Commissioner of Wealth-tax (Appeals) order regarding the assessment year 2002-2003. The only ground of appeal was against the confirmation of addition of `80,57,680, which was based on a cash seizure of &8377; 80,57,650 from the assessee by the crime branch of Mumbai Police. The Assessing Officer made the addition in the wealth-tax assessment following the income-tax assessment where the unexplained cash amounting to &8377; 80.57 lacs was confirmed. The learned CWT(A) upheld the assessment order stating that the addition was confirmed in the income-tax assessment. Upon hearing the submissions and examining the evidence, it was revealed that the cash seized from the assessee was converted into Fixed Deposit Receipts (FDRs) in the name of Asstt. Commissioner of Police. The FDR was eventually encashed in 2010 and the amount was credited to the assessee's bank account. The issue revolved around whether the FDR should be considered as part of the assessee's assets for wealth-tax assessment. Referring to Section 2(ea) of the Wealth-tax Act, it was noted that the definition of "assets" does not explicitly include bank deposits like FDRs. The provision specifies various categories of assets, including cash in hand exceeding a certain amount, but does not mention bank deposits. As the definition is exclusive and does not encompass FDRs or bank deposits, the FDR in question could not be included in the net wealth of the assessee. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and the addition was ordered to be deleted. In conclusion, the appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on November 29, 2011.
|
