Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2012 (4) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (4) TMI 72 - HC - Income TaxRecovery of arrears of tax and interest - learned counsel had further submitted that the petitioner would pay a sum of Rs.3 lakhs, which is about 1/3 of the amount said to be payable by the petitioner, as arrears of tax and interest - The attachment of the bank account of the petitioner, made by the second respondent, if any, in respect of the above mentioned dues, shall be raised, on the petitioner paying the amount of Rs.3 lakhs
Issues:
Challenging Assessment Order under Income Tax Act, 1961 Analysis: The petitioner filed a Writ Petition challenging the Assessment order passed by the second respondent under Section 143(3), read with section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petitioner had also appealed against the said order before the first respondent. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel stated that the petitioner would pay Rs.3 lakhs, which is 1/3 of the amount payable as arrears of tax and interest. The petitioner requested that upon payment, the first respondent should hear the appeal and decide it on merits and in accordance with the law. On the other hand, the respondents' counsel argued that the petitioner should pay 50% of the tax and interest due before any order is passed. The court directed the petitioner to pay Rs.3 lakhs towards the tax and interest for the assessment year 2009-2010 within four weeks to the second respondent. Upon this payment, the appeal filed by the petitioner before the first respondent would be disposed of promptly and in accordance with the law. However, the recovery of the remaining amount due from the petitioner would be stayed until further orders are passed in the appeal pending before the first respondent. Any attachment of the petitioner's bank account by the second respondent related to the mentioned dues would be lifted upon the payment of Rs.3 lakhs by the petitioner. The Writ Petition was granted accordingly with no costs imposed, and the connected Miscellaneous petitions were closed as a consequence of the judgment.
|