Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AAR Income Tax - 2012 (4) TMI AAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2012 (4) TMI 351 - AAR - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of payment under the "Services Agreement" as "fees for technical services" under Article 13(4) of the India-French DTAA.
2. Rate of tax deduction at source under Section 195(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Nature of payment as business profits under Article 7 of the India-French DTAA.
4. Taxability in India in the absence of a permanent establishment under Article 5 of the India-French DTAA.
5. Requirement of tax deduction at source under Section 195(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Classification of Payment as "Fees for Technical Services"
The applicant, a subsidiary of a French company, entered into a "Services Agreement" with Mersen, France, for advisory services. The Revenue contended that payments under the agreement qualify as "fees for technical services" under both the Income-tax Act and the India-French DTAA. The applicant argued that under the protocol to the DTAA, the scope should be limited to that in the India-US DTAA, which requires technical knowledge to be "made available" to the applicant. However, the judgment concluded that the services provided, including managerial and consultancy services, fall under "fees for technical services" as defined in Article 13(4) of the India-French DTAA, and thus are taxable in India.

Issue 2: Rate of Tax Deduction at Source
It was ruled that under paragraph 2 of Article 13 of the DTAA, the tax charged should not exceed 10% of the gross amount of the fees. Consequently, the applicant is required to deduct tax at source under Section 195(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at this rate.

Issue 3: Nature of Payment as Business Profits
The judgment clarified that the payments under the services agreement do not constitute business profits under Article 7 of the India-French DTAA. Therefore, the payments are not treated as business profits but as fees for technical services.

Issue 4: Taxability in the Absence of a Permanent Establishment
Given the classification of the payments as fees for technical services, the question of whether Mersen, France, has a permanent establishment in India under Article 5 of the DTAA does not arise. The payments are taxable in India regardless of the presence of a permanent establishment.

Issue 5: Requirement of Tax Deduction at Source
The ruling affirmed that the applicant is required to deduct tax at source under Section 195(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the payments made to Mersen, France, under the services agreement.

Conclusion:
The judgment concluded that the payments made by the applicant to Mersen, France, under the services agreement are classified as "fees for technical services" under Article 13(4) of the India-French DTAA. The applicable tax rate for deduction at source is 10% of the gross amount. The payments do not qualify as business profits and are taxable in India without considering the existence of a permanent establishment. The applicant is mandated to deduct tax at source under Section 195(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates