9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2012 (7) TMI 447 - AT - Service TaxWhether service tax paid on CHA services in respect of export of goods can be allowed as credit or not Held that - Government under Notification No. 17/2009-ST dated 7.7.2009 has since granted exemption to various taxable services provided to an exporter. CHA services are also exempted under Sl. No. 11 to the Table annexed to the said Notification. The present cases have arisen apparently in the absence of exemption notification for the previous period. The only way freeing export goods from domestic taxes can be ensured for the period relevant to these appeals is to allow credit of the service tax paid on the CHA and other services in respect of the export consignments so that the exporter would be compensated either by utilization of such credit for payment of other taxes or by taking refund when such utilization is not possible - appeal is allowed holding that the credit is admissible
Issues:
Whether service tax paid on CHA services in respect of export of goods can be allowed as credit or not. Analysis: The issue at hand revolves around the credit eligibility of service tax paid on CHA services concerning the export of goods. The Tribunal referred to a previous order in the case of M/s. Amalgamations Repco Ltd. & 14 Ors. Vs. CCE, Madurai & Trichy, which highlighted conflicting decisions regarding the allowance of such credit. Some decisions disallowed the credit, arguing that port area services are not input services for manufacturing goods. On the contrary, other decisions permitted the credit based on various reasons, such as the services being related to business activities or due to non-challenge to credit allowance in the past. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of distinguishing between the place of removal (factory gate) and the place of delivery (port area) in export scenarios. It also noted that the INCOterms agreed upon by the buyer and seller dictate the ownership and responsibilities regarding goods in international trade, emphasizing that such terms do not determine the eligibility of a service as an input service. The Tribunal also discussed the lack of harmonization between Section 37(2) (xviaa) of the Act and the definition of input service under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Some decisions were criticized for not aligning with the legal provisions, particularly regarding CHA services not being considered related to manufacturing activities. The Tribunal highlighted the government's policy not to burden export goods with domestic taxes to maintain competitiveness in foreign markets. It mentioned various schemes and exemptions in place to support export production without imposing domestic taxes on exported goods. Notably, the Tribunal referred to Notification No. 17/2009-ST, which exempted various taxable services provided to exporters, including CHA services. In light of the above considerations, the Tribunal upheld the impugned orders allowing credit of service tax paid on CHA and other services for export consignments where the Department was in appeal. Consequently, the departmental appeals were dismissed, except for one appeal where credit denial was overturned, affirming the credit's admissibility. Following the precedent set by previous decisions, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the present appeal, aligning with the rationale provided in the Tribunal's previous decision. The stay petition was also disposed of accordingly, concluding the matter in favor of allowing the credit for service tax paid on CHA services related to the export of goods.
|
