Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2012 (9) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2012 (9) TMI 620 - HC - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Allocation of Research and Development (R&D) expenses by the Head Office among manufacturing units.
2. Correlation between R&D expenses incurred by the Head Office and the business of the manufacturing units.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Allocation of Research and Development (R&D) expenses by the Head Office among manufacturing units:

The appellant, engaged in manufacturing ayurvedic medicines and ointments, operates a head office and four manufacturing units. The head office and each unit have their own R&D departments. For the assessment year 1993-1994, the appellant filed a return of income showing a total income of rupees nil, claiming deductions under sections 80-I, 80HH, and 80-IA for various units. The R&D expenses of Rs.38,70,000/- incurred by the head office were allocated by the Assessing Officer (AO) to the units based on their turnover. This allocation reduced the appellant's claim for deductions under Chapter VI-A for the units. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal upheld this allocation, justifying it on the grounds that the head office's R&D expenses benefited the manufacturing units.

2. Correlation between R&D expenses incurred by the Head Office and the business of the manufacturing units:

The appellant contended that the R&D activities conducted by the head office were unrelated to the business of the manufacturing units. The R&D work involved developing new medicines and medical formulae, which were not manufactured by any of the units. The Tribunal, however, presumed that the R&D expenses incurred by the head office benefited the manufacturing units. The appellant argued that the units did not benefit from the R&D activities as they did not manufacture the new drugs developed. The Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Sterling Foods was cited, emphasizing the need for a direct nexus between the profits and gains and the industrial undertaking for deductions under sections 80-HH, 80-I, and 80-IA. The Bombay High Court agreed with this view, stating that expenses unrelated to an industrial undertaking cannot be deducted while computing its profits and gains.

The Madras High Court's judgment in Bush Boake Allen (India) Ltd. vs. Asst. CIT was also referenced, supporting the appellant's argument that R&D expenses should not be allocated to a unit unless they directly relate to it. The Bombay High Court concluded that the presumption of a nexus between the R&D activities and the units was unfounded. The Court held that the R&D expenses incurred by the head office, which were unrelated to the units' activities, should not be apportioned to the units.

Conclusion:

The Bombay High Court answered both questions in favor of the assessee, holding that the R&D expenses incurred by the head office, which had no direct connection or benefit to the manufacturing units, should not be allocated to the units. The appeal was allowed, with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates