Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + Commissioner Service Tax - 2013 (2) TMI Commissioner This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (2) TMI 408 - Commissioner - Service Tax


Issues:
1. Whether Electricity Charges and Air conditioning charges are included in the taxable value of Renting of Immovable Property Service.
2. Whether Operation & Maintenance Charges are chargeable to Service tax under "Maintenance & Repair Service".

Analysis:

Issue 1:
The appellant, a Biotechnology Park, was under scrutiny for not including electricity and air conditioning charges in the taxable value while paying Service tax. The Department alleged suppression of facts to evade tax. The appellant argued that they acted as a "Pure Agent" for the government in promoting research and development in biotechnology. They provided detailed explanations regarding electricity charges collection and maintenance of records. The Commissioner found merit in the appellant's argument, stating that the electricity charges were incidental reimbursable expenses and need not be included in the taxable value. The tax already paid by the appellant was deemed in order.

Issue 2:
Regarding Operation & Maintenance Charges, the appellant started paying Service tax when Renting of Immovable Property Service became taxable. However, the demand for Service tax on these charges was made before the principal service became taxable, which was deemed irrational. The Show Cause Notice was also found to be time-barred, lacking the necessary elements to invoke the extended period under the Finance Act, 1994. Consequently, the demand for Service tax on Operation & Maintenance Charges was dismissed on both counts.

In conclusion, the Commissioner set aside the impugned Order-in-Original and allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates