Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2013 (8) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2013 (8) TMI 857 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
Miscellaneous application for additional grounds and documents, COD application for delay condonation, Stay applications against Order-in-Original, Service Tax liability on trading transaction.

Miscellaneous Application and COD Application:
The appellant filed a miscellaneous application for additional grounds and documents related to the sales transaction, which can only be considered at the final hearing. A COD application was also submitted to condone a 26-day delay due to filing separate appeals instead of a composite one. The COD application was allowed based on the satisfactory reason provided.

Background and Service Tax Liability:
The appellant, a trading corporation, imports and exports various commodities on behalf of traders. The Revenue alleged Service Tax liability under "Business Auxiliary Services" on the mark-up charged by the appellant on goods sold to customers. Service Tax demands of approximately Rs.16.54 crores were confirmed. The appellant contended that their transactions were simple trading, not services, and relied on a Circular clarifying customs valuation rules.

Appellant's Arguments:
The appellant argued that their transactions were on a principal-to-principal basis, involving simple trading where mark-ups were already included in customs duty. They referenced a Circular stating that trade margin is part of the taxable value for customs duty assessment. They also cited a Tribunal decision in a similar case where Service Tax liability was not attracted.

Revenue's Contention and Tribunal's Decision:
The Revenue argued that the appellant's transactions included a service element as they procured goods on behalf of clients. However, the Tribunal analyzed import documents and invoices, concluding that the transactions were sales/trading. The Tribunal noted that the trade margin was subject to customs duty, hence not liable for Service Tax under Business Auxiliary Services. Relying on a previous decision, the Tribunal granted a waiver from pre-deposit of the confirmed dues and stayed the recovery during the appeal's pendency.

This judgment clarifies the distinction between trading transactions and services for determining Service Tax liability under Business Auxiliary Services, emphasizing the inclusion of trade margin in customs duty valuation. The Tribunal's decision aligns with precedent, granting relief to the appellant based on the nature of their transactions and relevant circulars.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates