Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2014 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (7) TMI 557 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of the assessee's income under Section 80P(4).
2. Eligibility for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of the Assessee's Income under Section 80P(4):

The primary issue was whether the assessee, a co-operative society registered under the Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act, 1997, qualifies as a "co-operative bank" under Section 80P(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer (AO) had denied the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) on the grounds that the assessee is a primary co-operative bank, thus falling under the purview of Section 80P(4), which disallows such deductions.

2. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i):

The assessee contended that it is not a co-operative bank but a co-operative society engaged in providing credit facilities to its members, and hence, eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i). The assessee argued that the activities were limited to its members and relied on various judicial precedents to support its claim.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification under Section 80P(4):

The Tribunal examined whether the assessee qualifies as a "co-operative bank" by analyzing the definition under Part V of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949. According to Section 5(CCV) of the Banking Regulation Act, a "primary co-operative bank" must meet three conditions:
- The primary object or principal business is the transaction of banking business.
- The paid-up share capital and reserves are not less than Rs. 1 lakh.
- The bye-laws do not permit the admission of any other co-operative society as a member.

The Tribunal found that:
- The primary object of the assessee was not the transaction of banking business as it did not accept deposits from non-members, failing the first condition.
- The assessee met the second condition as its paid-up share capital and reserves exceeded Rs. 1 lakh.
- The bye-laws allowed the admission of other co-operative societies as members, failing the third condition.

Since the assessee did not meet all three conditions, it was not classified as a "primary co-operative bank" and thus, not a "co-operative bank" under Section 80P(4).

2. Eligibility for Deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i):

The Tribunal noted that Section 80P(2)(a)(i) allows deductions for co-operative societies engaged in the business of banking or providing credit facilities to its members. Since the assessee was a co-operative society providing credit facilities exclusively to its members and not a "co-operative bank," it was eligible for the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).

Judicial Precedents:

The Tribunal referred to various judicial precedents, including:
- Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in CIT vs. Jafari Momin Vikas Co-op. Credit Society Ltd.
- Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in Vyavasaya Seva Sahakara Sangha vs. State of Karnataka & Ors.
- Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal in ITO vs. Divyajyothi Credit Co-operative Society Ltd.
- Panaji Bench in DCIT vs. Jayalakshmi Mahila Vividodeshagala Souharda Sahakari Ltd.
- Panaji Bench in Tararani Mahila Co-operative Credit Society vs. ITO.
- Delhi High Court in ACIT vs. Palhawas Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society Ltd.

These cases supported the view that Section 80P(4) applies only to co-operative banks and not to co-operative credit societies.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal concluded that the assessee is not a co-operative bank and hence, the provisions of Section 80P(4) do not apply. The assessee is entitled to the deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for the income generated from providing credit facilities to its members. The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, and the AO was directed to grant the deduction.

Order Pronounced:

The order was pronounced in the open court on 04.07.2014, allowing the appeals filed by the assessee.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates