Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2014 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (8) TMI 565 - HC - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Interpretation of Section 10(23C)(iiiad) regarding exclusion of receipt from the sale of bonds and property as capital receipt for determining exemption eligibility.

Analysis:
The case involved a dispute over the interpretation of Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, specifically regarding the exclusion of receipts from the sale of bonds and property as capital receipts for determining exemption eligibility. The appellant, the Revenue, challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which had allowed the assessee's claim for exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) for the assessment year 2004-2005. The substantial question of law raised was whether the Tribunal was correct in excluding the receipt from the sale of bonds and property from the aggregate receipts, considering them as capital receipts and non-recurring in nature.

The facts revealed that the assessee, an educational institution, had received income from the sale of land and bonds during the financial year 2003-2004. The Assessing Officer initially denied the exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) on the grounds that the receipts exceeded the prescribed limit and the trust was not registered under Section 12A of the Act. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) accepted the assessee's argument that the sale proceeds were capital in nature and not recurring income, allowing 85% of the sale proceeds to be considered as expended for the trust's objectives.

The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), emphasizing that the sale proceeds from land and bonds were capital receipts, not annual receipts, and were utilized for maintaining the educational institution. The Tribunal concluded that the exclusion of these receipts from the aggregate annual receipts was justified, leading to the grant of exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) to the assessee. Subsequently, the Revenue appealed against this decision.

Upon hearing the arguments and examining the relevant provisions, the High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision. It clarified that the sale proceeds of land and bonds could not be equated to annual receipts as per Section 10(23C) of the Act. The Court affirmed that the sale was a conversion of a capital asset and not a recurring income, supporting the conclusion reached by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal. Consequently, the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed as lacking merit, with no substantial question of law for consideration.

In summary, the judgment clarified the distinction between capital receipts and annual receipts under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Income Tax Act, affirming the exclusion of sale proceeds from bonds and property as non-recurring income for determining exemption eligibility for educational institutions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates