Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2014 (12) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (12) TMI 643 - HC - Customs


Issues:
- Jurisdiction of CESTAT in hearing appeals related to payment of drawback
- Applicability of C.B.E. & C. Circular No. 57/95-Cus.
- Eligibility of respondent for drawback before CESTAT order

Jurisdiction of CESTAT:
The case involved exporters of Garments claiming drawback amount with interest, rejected by Deputy Commissioner of Customs and Commissioner of Appeals. CESTAT allowed appeals directing the Department to pay interest. The appellant raised questions on CESTAT's jurisdiction under Section 129A of the Customs Act, stating the Tribunal cannot handle matters related to drawback amount and interest. The appellant argued that Chapter X of the Customs Act, dealing with drawbacks and interest, is excluded from CESTAT's purview as per Section 129A.

Applicability of Circular and Eligibility:
The respondents' claims for interest on drawback were initially rejected by lower authorities but accepted by CESTAT. The respondents argued that the Tribunal rightly considered their interest claims, as the entire Chapter 10 of the Customs Act is not excluded from CESTAT's jurisdiction. They contended that the Tribunal's decision to allow interest claims was justified. The judgment highlighted that Chapter 10 of the Customs Act indeed covers drawback amounts and interest.

Legal Analysis and Conclusion:
The Court noted that Section 129A explicitly excludes matters related to Chapter X of the Customs Act from CESTAT's jurisdiction. Relying on past decisions, the Court supported the appellant's argument, emphasizing that CESTAT cannot handle issues concerning interest on drawback amounts. Despite the Department not appealing the drawback amount, the Court held that this does not prevent them from challenging the interest payment under Section 129A. Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals were allowed, setting aside CESTAT's orders. The respondents were advised to seek remedies through revision before the Central Government.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates