9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (2) TMI 294 - HC - Income TaxEntitlement to claim deduction under section 80-IA - AO disallowed the assessees' claim under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act primarily on the ground that carried forward loss of earlier years should be set off before computing the profit for the current year. - Held that - All the business undertakings are wind mills and they have claimed the benefit of deduction under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years in question and for the subsequent years as well. Having exercised their option and their losses have been set off already against other income of the business enterprise, the assessee in this appeal falls within the parameters of Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act. See Velayudhasamy Spinning Mills (2010 (3) TMI 860 - Madras High Court ) - Decided in favour of the assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to Deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act. 2. Applicability of Previous Court Decisions to the Current Case. 3. Treatment of Losses and Deductions from Previous Years. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Entitlement to Deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act: The core issue raised in this Tax Case (Appeal) is whether the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the respondent/assessee is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act. The court referred to the decision in Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills V. Asst. CIT, which clarified that Chapter VI-A provides for incentives in the form of tax deductions essentially belonging to the category of "profit-linked incentives." The court concluded that the assessee should not be denied the admissible deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act. 2. Applicability of Previous Court Decisions to the Current Case: The learned counsel for the assessee argued that the issue had already been decided by the court in the Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills case, and thus, the same precedent should be followed. The court agreed, noting that the facts of the present case are identical to those in the Velayudhaswamy Spinning Mills case. The court also referenced a batch of cases in T.C.(A)Nos.408 of 2012, where a similar decision was reached, thereby reinforcing the applicability of the previous judgment. 3. Treatment of Losses and Deductions from Previous Years: The court examined the treatment of losses and deductions from previous years, particularly in the context of Section 80-IA(5). It was emphasized that losses and other deductions that have been set off against the income of the previous year should not be reopened for the purpose of computing current year income under Section 80-IA. The court cited the Rajasthan High Court's decision in CIT v. Mewar Oil and General Mills Ltd., which held that once losses are set off against other income, they cannot be notionally brought forward and set off against the profits of the eligible business. The court concluded that the revenue cannot rework the set-off amount and bring it notionally for the current year. Conclusion: The court dismissed the appeal, confirming the order passed by the Tribunal. It held that the assessee is entitled to the deduction under Section 80-IA, and the previous losses that have been set off against other income cannot be reopened. The questions of law raised in this appeal were answered against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee. The Tax Case (Appeal) stands dismissed, and consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2014 is also dismissed.
|
