9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (7) TMI 932 - AT - Income TaxAccrual of income - Contribution received from the members - whether is to be assessed in the year of receipt or assessee is to be permitted to spread over, over a period of five years? - whether CIT(A) has erred in confirming the addition received as capital contribution from members for discharge through effluent channel constructed by the assessee? - Held that - As decided in earlier years of assessee s own case 2010 (10) TMI 717 - ITAT, Ahmedabad a clear right is given by the assessee-company to the members to utilise its capital facilities for a period of 99 years for discharge of agreed quantities of effluent. Thus the one-time membership fee is not in fact in return for any obligation or services rendered by the assessee in one year. It is a receipt in advance for an obligation to be rendered in future. Thus it cannot be said that income has actually accrued to the assessee in one year even though it might have received it in one year. Mere receipt does not ensure accrual unless an equivalent part of the agreed services by the receiver is rendered. - Following the decision of Asst. CIT v. Mahindra Holidays and Resorts (India) Ltd. (2010 (5) TMI 524 - ITAT, CHENNAI) we hold that the assessee was justified in deferring the revenue for taxation for four years. Respectfully following the above order of the ITAT, we set aside the issue as far as determination of taxability of the receipts received in this year to the file of the AO. The ld. AO shall re-work the amount out of the contribution received in this year on the basis of the Tribunal s findings in the Asst.Year 2001-02. In other words, the receipt received by the assessee during the accounting period relevant for this assessment year is also to be spread over, over a period of five years. The total receipt cannot be assessed in this year. Enhancement made by the ld.CIT(A) is concerned, we do not find any error in the order of the ld.CIT(A), because, the assessee ought to have shown that the amount as income on the basis of claim made in earlier years, i.e. whatever amount representing the alleged 1/5th ought to be offered for taxation in this year. The ld.First Appellate Authority has rightly made the enhancement. - Decided partly in favour of assessee for statistical purposes.
Issues Involved:
1. Taxability of capital contributions received from members. 2. Method of income recognition for the contributions. 3. Enhancement of income by the First Appellate Authority. Detailed Analysis: 1. Taxability of Capital Contributions Received from Members: The primary issue concerns whether the capital contributions received by the assessee from its members should be treated as revenue receipts and taxed in the year of receipt or spread over a period of five years. The assessee, a company engaged in the conveyance of industrial effluent, received contributions from members for the use of its effluent disposal facilities. The contributions were initially shown as revenue receipts but were recognized as income over five years. The Assessing Officer (AO) contended that these contributions should be taxed entirely in the year of receipt, whereas the assessee argued they were capital contributions and should be deferred. The Tribunal referred to its earlier decision in the assessment year 2001-02, which rejected the assessee's contention that the contributions were capital in nature. However, it acknowledged the assessee's method of spreading the income over five years, following the Special Bench order in the case of Mahindra Holidays and Resort (I) Ltd. The Tribunal concluded that the contributions represent revenue receipts but should be spread over five years due to the ongoing obligation of the assessee to provide services over this period. 2. Method of Income Recognition for the Contributions: The Tribunal emphasized that the income does not accrue merely on receipt but must be matched with the performance of the obligation. The Special Bench in Mahindra Holidays & Resorts (India) Ltd. held that fees received for future services should not be taxed entirely in the year of receipt, as it would distort the income. The assessee's obligation to provide effluent disposal services over 99 years justified spreading the income over subsequent years. The Tribunal applied this principle to the assessee's case, determining that the contributions received should be spread over five years. This method aligns with the accounting standards and ensures that the income is recognized in proportion to the services rendered. 3. Enhancement of Income by the First Appellate Authority: The First Appellate Authority (CIT(A)) enhanced the assessee's income by Rs. 23,95,082/- for not offering 1/5th of the contributions received in earlier years for taxation in the current year. The Tribunal upheld this enhancement, stating that the assessee should have included this amount as income based on its previous claims of deferring the contributions over five years. The Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)'s order, as the enhancement was consistent with the assessee's method of income recognition. The Tribunal directed the AO to rework the taxability of the receipts received during the assessment year based on the Tribunal's findings in the assessment year 2001-02. Conclusion: The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, confirming the method of spreading the contributions over five years, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal, which sought to tax the entire contributions in the year of receipt. The enhancement of income by the CIT(A) was upheld, ensuring that the deferred income from previous years was correctly included in the current year's taxable income. Order Pronounced: The order was pronounced in the Court on 24th July 2015 at Ahmedabad.
|
