Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2015 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (8) TMI 566 - HC - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
- Interpretation of section 32(1)(iia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding additional depreciation on new machinery or plant acquired and installed after March 31, 2005.
- Determination of eligibility for additional depreciation under clause (iia) in relation to original depreciation claim made under clause (i) of section 32(1).
- Adjudication on whether the assessee is entitled to additional depreciation under clause (ii) irrespective of the original claim for depreciation under clause (i) of section 32(1).

Analysis:

The High Court of Calcutta heard an appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against a consolidated order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the addition of Rs. 4,17,27,868 made by the Assessing Officer on the ground of additional depreciation. The main issue was whether the assessee, engaged in the business of manufacturing, was entitled to additional depreciation under clause (iia) of section 32(1) for new machinery or plant acquired after March 31, 2005. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim, stating that the power plant depreciation was under clause (i) of section 32(1), and hence, additional depreciation under clause (iia) was not applicable.

The appellant argued that the definition of block of assets under section 2(11) supported the Assessing Officer's decision and cited a judgment of the Madras High Court. On the other hand, the respondent relied on a Gujarat High Court judgment to support the eligibility for additional depreciation under clause (iia). The Court analyzed the provisions of section 32(1)(iia) and concluded that the assessee, having acquired and installed the necessary machinery for power generation, was entitled to claim additional depreciation under clause (iia) irrespective of the original depreciation claim under clause (i).

The Court found that clause (iia) of section 32(1) provides for additional depreciation on new machinery or plant acquired after March 31, 2005, without a direct link to the original depreciation claim. Therefore, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the appeal and the application. The judgment clarified that the eligibility for additional depreciation under clause (iia) is independent of the initial depreciation claim made under clause (i) of section 32(1).

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates