9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (2) TMI 653 - HC - VAT and Sales TaxEvasion of sales tax / value added tax (VAT) - levy of penalty - transaction is in the court of interstate sale and not local sale - jurisdiction of state government - proceedings based on the statement of the Driver - Held that - The appellant relies upon the invoice and challan outward to substantiate that the transaction with the Government organization NAFED was bonafide and genuine. The Tribunal has not looked into the entire documents to record a finding that any attempt of evasion was made or that the documents were not genuine and had merely gone by the alleged admission of the driver. In our opinion, the order of the Tribunal cannot be sustained as the Tribunal was required to examine the entire material on record before concluding whether there was any attempt to evade tax on the part of the dealer. - Matter remanded back.
Issues:
1. Identification of identical issues in two appeals. 2. Substantial questions of law for determination. 3. Admissibility of appeals and substantial questions of law. 4. Allegations of tax evasion and manipulation of documents. 5. Justification of penalty imposed under Section 37(6) of HGST Act. 6. Examination of evidence and documents. 7. Adjudication based on evidence and statements. 8. Consideration of bonafide transactions with a government organization. 9. Evaluation of Tribunal's decision and remand for fresh order. Issue 1: Identification of Identical Issues The judgment pertains to two appeals, VATAP Nos. 134 and 148 of 2012, involving identical issues, acknowledged by both parties and consolidated for efficiency. Issue 2: Substantial Questions of Law The appeals were admitted for determining substantial questions of law, including the genuineness of transactions with a government undertaking, justification of penalties imposed, and the validity of Tribunal's decisions based on evidence and statements. Issue 3: Admissibility of Appeals and Substantial Questions of Law The appellant filed appeals against the orders of the Haryana Tax Tribunal, challenging penalties imposed for alleged tax evasion. The High Court admitted the appeals for consideration of substantial questions of law raised by the parties. Issue 4: Allegations of Tax Evasion and Document Manipulation The appellant, engaged in foodgrain trade, faced allegations of tax evasion based on a driver's statement. The authorities imposed penalties citing attempts to evade tax, despite payments through banking channels and documentation. Issue 5: Justification of Penalty under HGST Act The Tribunal upheld penalties under Section 37(6) of the HGST Act, despite the appellant's argument that the transaction was an interstate sale not invoking CST Act provisions. The High Court was tasked with evaluating the justification for the penalty. Issue 6: Examination of Evidence and Documents The Tribunal's decision was based on the driver's statement, overlooking documentary evidence provided by the appellant, such as invoices and waybills. The High Court emphasized the importance of considering all evidence before concluding on tax evasion attempts. Issue 7: Adjudication Based on Evidence and Statements The Tribunal adjudicated that the appellant failed to counter the authorities' orders and driver's statement, indicating tax evasion attempts. The decision was supported by the absence of evidence contradicting the driver's statement. Issue 8: Consideration of Bonafide Transactions with Government Organization The appellant highlighted transactions with NAFED, a government entity, as genuine, supported by documentary evidence. The High Court criticized the Tribunal for not thoroughly examining the documents and relying solely on the driver's statement. Issue 9: Evaluation of Tribunal's Decision and Remand for Fresh Order Ultimately, the High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the Tribunal's orders, and remanded the matter for a fresh decision. The Court directed the Tribunal to review the case comprehensively, considering all evidence and providing a reasoned decision after hearing the appellant. This comprehensive analysis outlines the legal judgment's key aspects, including the issues addressed, the arguments presented, and the High Court's decision to remand the case for further review.
|
