Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2016 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (3) TMI 64 - AT - Central Excise


Issues Involved:
- Disallowance of Cenvat credit on banking and financial services
- Disallowance of Cenvat credit on courier services
- Disallowance of Cenvat credit on canteen facility maintenance
- Disallowance of Cenvat credit on job work activities
- Transfer of Cenvat credit from DTA Unit to EOU Unit

Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Cenvat credit on Banking and Financial Services:
The Revenue contested the disallowance of Cenvat credit on banking and financial services, arguing that the services were beyond the place of removal and hence not admissible for credit. However, the Tribunal held that such services fall under the definition of input service and have been utilized for business purposes, making the Cenvat credit valid under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

2. Disallowance of Cenvat credit on Courier Services:
The Revenue raised an issue regarding the disallowance of Cenvat credit on courier services, claiming that there was no nexus with the manufacture of excisable goods. However, citing precedents, the Tribunal upheld the Cenvat credit on courier services, stating that they are integrally connected to the business of the manufacturer/service provider, as established in previous judgments.

3. Disallowance of Cenvat credit on Canteen Facility Maintenance:
Regarding the disallowance of Cenvat credit on canteen facility maintenance, the Tribunal referred to a judgment of the Hon'ble Karnataka High Court, emphasizing that when canteen facilities are provided due to statutory obligations like under the Factories Act, the expenses incurred are considered in fixing the price of the final product. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the Cenvat credit on such services.

4. Disallowance of Cenvat credit on Job Work Activities:
The Revenue contested the Cenvat credit availed on job work activities, arguing that the services were exempt from service tax. However, since the service providers were registered and the tax was accepted by the authorities, the Tribunal ruled that the credit taken by the recipient was valid based on proper invoices and compliance with the Cenvat statute.

5. Transfer of Cenvat credit from DTA Unit to EOU Unit:
The issue of transferring Cenvat credit from a DTA Unit to an EOU Unit was raised, and the Tribunal upheld the transfer based on a previous decision that barred the transfer of credit on capital goods only, not on inputs. The Tribunal allowed the transfer of Cenvat credit in this case.

In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, finding no infirmity in the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) and upholding the validity of the Cenvat credit claimed by the respondent on various services and activities.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates