9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (4) TMI 648 - AT - Income TaxDisallowance of claim of bad debts - Held that - Bad debts claimed by the assessee should be set off against the opening balance available in the Provision for bad and doubtful debts account created u/s. 36(1)(viia) of the Act and the balance shall be allowable as deduction u/s 36(1)(vii) of the Act supported by the Instruction No. 17 of 2008 dated 26.11.2008 issued by CBDT and case of CIT Vs. UTI Bank Ltd. 2013 (1) TMI 209 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT Disallowance of interest expenditure relating to tax free income, apparently u/s 14A - Held that - the claim of the assessee with regard to availability of interest free funds requires examination at the end of the Assessing Officer. Accordingly we set aside the order of learned CIT(A) on this issue and direct the Assessing Officer to examine this issue afresh by considering the funds position of the assessee and take appropriate decision by following the ratio laid down by Hon ble Jurisdictional Bombay High Court in the case of HDFC Bank Ltd. (2014 (8) TMI 119 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT ). Disallowance of depreciation on leased assets - Held that - By following the decision rendered in the case of ICDS vs. CIT 2013 (1) TMI 344 - SUPREME COURT as well as Coordinate Benches of the Tribunal in assessee s own case, we set aside the order of learned CIT(A) on this issue and direct the Assessing Officer to allow the claim of depreciation on leased assets
Issues involved:
1. Disallowance of bad debts 2. Disallowance of interest expenditure relating to tax-free income 3. Disallowance of depreciation on leased assets 4. Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act 5. Disallowance of broken period interest Analysis: 1. Disallowance of Bad Debts: - The assessee, a banking company, claimed bad debts written off should be set off against the opening balance of "Provisions for bad and doubtful debts." The issue was supported by CBDT Circular and a decision by the Gujarat High Court in favor of the assessee. - The ITAT Mumbai set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the Assessing Officer to allow the claim of the assessee in accordance with the CBDT Circular and the High Court decision. 2. Disallowance of Interest Expenditure: - The issue related to disallowance of interest expenditure on tax-free income under section 14A of the Act. - The ITAT Mumbai directed the Assessing Officer to examine the funds position of the assessee to decide the issue following the decision of the Bombay High Court and a previous Tribunal case. 3. Disallowance of Depreciation on Leased Assets: - The assessee claimed depreciation on leased assets, citing previous Tribunal decisions and a Supreme Court ruling in their favor. - The ITAT Mumbai directed the Assessing Officer to allow the claim of depreciation on leased assets, setting aside the CIT(A) order. 4. Disallowance u/s 14A of the Act: - The ITAT Mumbai set aside the issue of disallowance u/s 14A of the Act to the Assessing Officer for further examination based on the revenue's grievance. 5. Disallowance of Broken Period Interest: - The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A) decision on the disallowance of broken period interest, as it was in line with a previous Tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee. 6. Overall Conclusion: - The ITAT Mumbai considered and decided on various issues raised by both the assessee and the revenue for multiple assessment years. The judgments were based on legal precedents, circulars, and previous rulings, ensuring a fair and comprehensive resolution for each issue. The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed, while those of the revenue were dismissed, with modifications to the CIT(A) orders in accordance with the ITAT's decisions.
|
