2016 (9) TMI 96 - AT - Service Tax

CENVAT credit manufacture of soaps and detergent job-work service tax paid by job-worker the process of conversion of absolute unusable detergent material into scrap - manufacturing process Held that - an assessee cannot be denied the benefit of Cenvat Credit of duty on the ground that no manufacturing activity was involved, when the assessee has admittedly cleared its final product on payment of duty. Similar issue decided in the case Asian Colour Coated Ispat Ltd 2014 (9) TMI 974 - CESTAT NEW DELHI. appeal allowed decided in favor of appellant.

Summary

Issues:
1. Availment of Cenvat Credit on service tax paid by job workers for converting unusable detergent material into scrap.
2. Disallowance of Cenvat Credit by revenue authorities on the grounds of no manufacturing activity involved.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Availment of Cenvat Credit on service tax paid by job workers
The appellant, engaged in manufacturing soaps and detergent, sent unusable detergent material to job workers for reprocessing into scrap. The job workers paid service tax on their charges, which the appellant availed as credit. The revenue objected to this credit claiming no further activity was conducted by the appellant on the materials received. However, it was noted that the appellant discharged their duty liability on the received materials, indicating a manufacturing activity. The Tribunal referred to a previous case where it was held that if the final product is cleared on payment of duty, the assessee cannot be denied Cenvat Credit, even if no manufacturing activity is directly involved. Therefore, the appellant was allowed to avail the credit in this case.

Issue 2: Disallowance of Cenvat Credit by revenue authorities
The revenue authorities disallowed the Cenvat Credit on the grounds that the process of converting unusable detergent material into scrap did not constitute a manufacturing process. However, the Tribunal emphasized that the crucial factor was the payment of Central Excise duty by the appellant on the final product. Since the duty was paid, it was inferred that some manufacturing activity was involved, regardless of the nature of the specific process. The Tribunal relied on a previous decision to support the appellant's right to avail the credit, as long as duty was discharged on the cleared goods. Consequently, the impugned order disallowing the credit was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with relief to the appellant.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's decision in this case clarified that the availment of Cenvat Credit should not be denied solely based on the absence of traditional manufacturing processes, as long as the final product is cleared on payment of duty. The judgment underscored the importance of duty payment as a determining factor for credit eligibility, rather than the specific nature of the manufacturing activity involved.