Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + SC Service Tax - 2016 (10) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2016 (10) TMI 392 - SC - Service TaxFailure on the part of appellants to take fresh steps in the respect of the sole respondent despite opportunities given - matters processed for listing before the Hon ble Judge in Chambers for further directions - Four weeks time as last chance is given to appellant to comply with the terms of the order dated 18.07.2016 of the Court in respect of the respondents - the appellant to file the deficit court fee within four weeks as last chance.
Issues involved: Failure to take fresh steps for listing, Non-compliance with court orders, Service of notice completion, Deficit court fee payment
Failure to take fresh steps for listing: The judgment addresses multiple cases where the appellants' counsels failed to take fresh steps for listing despite opportunities given. The court directs these matters to be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further directions. The order emphasizes the need for the counsels to actively pursue the cases and comply with procedural requirements to move the cases forward. Non-compliance with court orders: In specific cases, such as C.A. Nos. 1335-1358/2015 and C.A. No. 3247/2015, the court grants the appellants' counsels a last chance to comply with the terms of previous court orders regarding unserved or sole respondents. Failure to adhere to these orders may result in further actions by the court, highlighting the importance of following court directives promptly. Service of notice completion: For C.A. No. 4208/2015, the court notes the completion of service of notice on the sole respondent, but no appearance has been made on his behalf. Consequently, the matter is set to be listed before the Hon'ble Court in accordance with the rules. This aspect underscores the significance of proper service and participation in legal proceedings. Deficit court fee payment: In C.A. No. 5601/2015, the appellant's counsel is directed to file the deficit court fee within four weeks as a final opportunity. This requirement highlights the necessity of fulfilling financial obligations related to court proceedings to ensure the smooth progression of the case. It serves as a reminder for parties to meet all financial requirements promptly. Overall, the judgment emphasizes the importance of active participation, compliance with court orders, proper service of notices, and timely fulfillment of financial obligations to facilitate the effective and efficient resolution of legal matters before the court.
|