Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2016 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (11) TMI 669 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of deduction u/s 80P(2) of the Act
2. Disallowance of interest payment under section 40(a)(ia) due to non-deduction of tax at source

Analysis:

Issue 1: Disallowance of deduction u/s 80P(2) of the Act
The case revolved around the disallowance of the deduction u/s 80P(2) of the Act by the Assessing Officer, who claimed that the assessee, a service co-operative bank, did not fulfill its main object of providing financial accommodation to its members for agricultural purposes. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, leading to appeals to the Tribunal. The Hon'ble High Court, in a similar case involving a primary agricultural credit society, had ruled that such societies are entitled to the benefit of deduction u/s 80P(2) and that the provisions of section 80P(4) do not apply to them. The Tribunal, after verifying that the assessee was indeed a primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Cooperative Societies Act, allowed the appeal, stating that the assessee was entitled to the deduction u/s 80P(2).

Issue 2: Disallowance of interest payment under section 40(a)(ia)
The Assessing Officer also disallowed interest payment under section 40(a)(ia) due to non-deduction of tax at source, arguing that the exemption under section 194A(3)(viia) did not apply as the assessee was not a primary agricultural credit society. However, since the Tribunal established that the assessee was a primary agricultural credit society entitled to the deduction u/s 80P(2), it followed that the exemption for non-deduction of tax under section 194A(3)(viia) applied to the assessee. Consequently, the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was deemed unwarranted, and the appeal filed by the revenue on this issue was dismissed.

In conclusion, the appeal filed by the assessee was allowed as they were entitled to the deduction u/s 80P(2), while the appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed concerning the disallowance of interest payment. The cross objection filed by the assessee was also dismissed as it did not raise any specific grievance.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates