Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (12) TMI 788 - AT - Income TaxTDS credit - Held that - Commissioner of Income Tax(A) while directing the Assessing Officer to allow the credit of TDS has noted that orders of ITAT Delhi Bench in DCIT vs M/s Lloyd Insulation (India) Ltd. (2013 (1) TMI 35 - ITAT NEW DELHI) ITO vs Sikka International Freight Services Pvt. Ltd. 2010 (2) TMI 930 - ITAT DELHI have directed that the credit be allowed. We have also perused the orders cited before the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) and duly noted by him in his appellate order while allowing relief to the assessee. Addition on account of repairs and maintenance general and office expenses - Held that - Similar disallowance has been made in assessment year 2007-08 against which the assessee had not filed any appeal. A perusal of the assessment order shows that the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) is absolutely correct in observing that the disallowance has been made on an estimate and we are also in agreement with the adjudication of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) that ad hoc disallowance without pointing out any specific defect or lacuna is not sustainable. Therefore we uphold the adjudication of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) on this issue also and dismiss ground no. 3 of the department s appeal. Disallowance on account of personal use of vehicle maintenance - Held that - Although the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A) has deleted the disallowance it is an admitted fact that the assessee has not been maintaining any log book and therefore while we uphold the action of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A) in deleting the disallowance on account of depreciation we are of the considered opinion that 10% of vehicle running and maintenance expenses is a reasonable estimate and in absence of log book we set aside the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(A) on this issue and restore the disallowance. Thus ground no. 4 is partly allowed. Disallowance of 10% out of telephone expenses - Held that - We are of the considered opinion that in absence of details this disallowance also needs to be upheld. Hence we set aside the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A) on this issue and restore the disallowance.
|