Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2018 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (4) TMI 961 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
1. Liability to pay Service Tax under the category of Construction of Residential Complex Service for construction activities related to JNNURM Scheme.
2. Tax liability for development of plots in slum locality under Valmiki Awas Mission- Baba Saheb Ambedkar Yojana.

Analysis:
1. The appellant, engaged in construction activities, appealed against the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Indore's order holding them liable to pay Service Tax for construction of residential units for Indore Municipal Corporation under JNNURM Scheme. The appellant argued that there is a specific exemption under Notification 28/2010 ST for such construction. The Tribunal noted that the construction for EWS JNNURM falls under the exemption, and the appellant was not involved in constructing residential units but in developing plots. The Tribunal referred to a previous order by the Commissioner holding against tax liability for similar activities by the appellant's sister concern. The Tribunal concluded that the tax liability cannot be sustained as per the exemption and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal.

2. The dispute regarding tax liability for the development of plots in a slum locality under Valmiki Awas Mission- Baba Saheb Ambedkar Yojana was also addressed. The appellant contended that there was no construction involved, only development of cleared slum area for further use. The Tribunal acknowledged that the appellant was not engaged in construction of residential units but in developing the slum area for plotting under an arrangement with the main contractor for the Government of Madhya Pradesh. The Tribunal highlighted that the contract did not involve the construction of residential units, and based on the analysis, concluded that the tax liability against the appellant cannot be sustained. Therefore, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates